jump to navigation

Arthur C. Clarke… March 19, 2008

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Uncategorized.
trackback

arthur_c_clarke.gif

Was any man more blessed in the music and images for his send-off? On Channel4 News they announced Arthur C. Clarke’s departure with the iconic clip, the swelling strings of Thus Spoke Zarathustra above the image of Sun Earth and Moon from 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Well, if there’s an afterlife chances are he knows everything worth knowing now. He died at the age of 90. It’s a funny thing. He is one of those who achieved iconic status in a time when the international media was on the cusp of maturing, one of those people, one thinks of Carl Sagan, and Patrick Moore to a lesser extent, who were able to popularise science in a way which made them stars with near global reputations, and yet they were also clearly grounded in science and engineering. To some degree these were the tribunes of the space age, and their names are inextricably linked with it. And there are oddities too, because through the Kubrick connection there was a link not merely into popular culture but into some of the more idiosyncratic aspects of that culture (although one suspects that was as much a surprise to Kubrick as Clarke). It was their shared vision in 2001 that was to be the template for what many of us supposed the future would look like. That it hasn’t turned out quite like that has been… a … disappointment, but I don’t blame them.

Clarke, it is perhaps not widely known, was very much a political and social liberal and humanist, perhaps best expressed in his fiction in the sub-plot in 2010 about US/USSR confrontation. Indeed there’s a fascinating story in his biography about how a heated argument between him and a group including Robert Heinlein and Edward Teller in the 1980s saw him leaving the meeting, his internationalism as nothing against their boosterism of the Strategic Defence Initiative (Star Wars). He thought, rightly, that SDI was destabilising, and even his profound attachment to manned space flight was insufficient to convince him otherwise.

As to the writing? Well, I still think his early novels hold up extremely well, from a Fall of Moondust onwards… that said they are a trifle pedestrian. His mid period novels from the 1970s such as Rendezvous with Rama to the Fountains of Paradise are perhaps his best positing a reasonably plausible future development in space, but towards the end the novels became increasingly episodic with shorter and shorter chapters. That said he also collaborated on various novels, and while the successors to Rama with Gentry Lee always seemed bloated his more recent series with the excellent Stephen Baxter are strong – if flawed – works. In some ways his short stories are more interesting, ideas based and concise and with a surprising amount of humour.

A good and decent human being who always retained the burr of his original Somerset accent. He’ll be missed.

And as Starkadder of these parts noted on P.ie it’s not been a good time recently for Science Fiction or Fantasy, for Terry Pratchett has been diagnosed with a premature form of Alzheimers’ disease. Pratchett is a remarkable writer whose work is much more complex and thoughtful than his chosen genre might seem to indicate. There is something utterly admirable about his determination to continue much as before.

Comments»

1. Starkadder - March 19, 2008

Very sad about Arthur C. May he rest in peace.

I still remember Jack Williamson’s death two years ago
being very poignant-the guy started writing sci-fi & fantasy in
1928, & was still writing it in 2005.

2. WorldbyStorm - March 19, 2008

I loved Jack Williamson’s The Humanoids. Hard to believe he’s gone too…

3. smiffy - March 19, 2008

No, he wasn’t, although I daresay he would have been able to spell it correctly.

4. WorldbyStorm - March 19, 2008

You clearly didn’t read the first answer to your question.

So here it is again. No, he wasn’t. Indeed he wouldn’t accept a Knighthood from the UK govt until his name was cleared.

But then, you could have checked that for yourself on wiki or any number of sources and not wasted our time.

5. smiffy - March 20, 2008

For readers confused by the comments above, I’ve deleted a number of comments posted by a moron trolling the site.

6. Conor McCabe - March 20, 2008

I’m a bit confused. Is it morons, or trolls, who will get their comments deleted?

7. D.J.P. O'Kane - March 20, 2008

I used to love Clarke’s books – they’re on a whole other level compared to Asimov or Heinlein.

But where the allegations against him are concerned, I’m going to go with the Scottish ‘not proven’ verdict. It’s one for the biographers, I think.

8. splinteredsunrise - March 20, 2008

I pretty much grew up on Asimov… although I later moved on to Harry Harrison. Who is a lot funnier than either Isaac or Arthur C. Still living in Cork last I heard?

9. Starkadder - March 21, 2008

Does anyone know what ACC’s political beliefs were? I
heard he was critical of the Reagan administration’s
“Star Wars” program.

10. WorldbyStorm - March 21, 2008

DJP, not sure about that. The Sri Lankan authorities did some serious investigation. Not sure he’d have got the knighthood had there been any hint of controversy, particularly during that period where the British royals were very aware of media etc, etc.

splintered, he is indeed, writing parallel histories along the lines of Harry Turtledoves about an American Civil War played out in part on Ireland. I like his stuff a lot. And from him it’s a short hop to Robert Anton Wilson and his ilk.

Starkadder, liberal vaguely leftist humanist. There are some on the right – particularly Heinlein fans – who are still miffed about the argument he had with them over Star Wars.

11. Starkadder - March 21, 2008

Yes, he did come across as a bit of a liberal humanist alright.

I remember Clarke used to exchange letters with his
friend, the Irish fantasy writer Lord Dunsany (the
friend of Yeats, Ledwidge and Mary Lavin) which were
collected in a small press book years ago.

12. WorldbyStorm - March 21, 2008

Interesting, I’d like to read them…

BTW folks, for all as are interested go to our moderation policy. It’s very clear. Anything defamatory or unsubstantiated is deleted including attacks on contributors. That’s the way it works around here.