Trotsky and The Wire: Or Adventures on the Times Website October 18, 2009
Posted by Garibaldy in Books, Film and Television, History, Trotskyism.46 comments
Two things that might be of interest to readers I noticed while browsing today’s Sunday Times online. The first is a review by Robert Harris of Robert Service’s new biography of Trotsky. On the basis of the review, it seems that the book is far from friendly to Trotsky. The review, for example, claims that Trotsky never visited Lenin after his stroke in 1922, something that came as a surprise to me if true, having read quite a lot of both Trotsky and the accounts of various Trotskyist groups of the political testament issue. Anyway, here is part of the blurb for the book on theHarvard University Press website
Trotsky is perhaps the most intriguing and, given his prominence, the most understudied of the Soviet revolutionaries. Using new archival sources including family letters, party and military correspondence, confidential speeches, and medical records, Service offers new insights into Trotsky. He discusses Trotsky’s fractious relations with the leaders he was trying to bring into a unified party before 1914; his attempt to disguise his political closeness to Stalin; and his role in the early 1920s as the progenitor of political and cultural Stalinism. Trotsky evinced a surprisingly glacial and schematic approach to making revolution. Service recounts Trotsky’s role in the botched German revolution of 1923; his willingness to subject Europe to a Red Army invasion in the 1920s; and his assumption that peasants could easily be pushed onto collective farms. Service also sheds light on Trotsky’s character and personality: his difficulties with his Jewish background, the development of his oratorical skills and his preference for writing over politicking, his inept handling of political factions and coldness toward associates, and his aversion to assuming personal power.
I’m sure the idea of Trotsky’s political closeness to Stalin will raise a few hackles. As will the photograph at the top of the review. There are two versions of it; one with Trotsky and Lenin, and one without Trotsky. But the header says that Trotsky was added in. Is the case of the Trotskyist school of the falsification of history, or is the Sunday Times mistaken? I’d be interested if anybody knows the truth. I doubt I’ll have time to read the book anytime soon, but if anybody does so, please feel free to let us know what you thought. A review by Simon Sebag Montefiore is also here.
On a different note, the website also has a podcast of David Simon talking about why he created The Wire, as well as a transcript of his talk. I’m sure that will be of interest to people here too. Conor McCabe has some recent thoughts on The Wire and Irish politics here.
So overall then, the Murdoch press has its uses, even if accidentally.
What’s the Point? Part II October 17, 2009
Posted by Garibaldy in Northern Ireland.2 comments
The low-level sectarian intimidation that scars so much of Northern Ireland continues, as we can see in this story of a Protestant family being forced out of the county Antrim village of Rasharkin, which has seen numerous sectarian incidents over recent months. Similar stories can be told from many small towns and villages across the six counties, as Splintered Sunrise noted in this thoughtul piece. There is of course a point in the attacks on GAA clubs and orange halls, and in bricks, bottles, snooker and golf balls, fireworks etc hurled across the peaceline, or the painting of sectarian slogans on family homes. Marking territory, keeping sectarianism on the boil as a means of trying to encourage young people to join paramilitary organisations, faction fighting etc. Is enough being done to stop it though? Clearly not. It is essential not only that communities speak out and act against this type of behaviour, but that the police and courts treat it more seriously. These are not petty crimes; they are hate crimes, and should be treated as such. Minimum gaol terms in the years for sectarian crimes would be a good start. That way fewer people will feel they have to leave their homes, and people will take all expressions of sectarianism more seriously.
This weekend I’ll mostly be listening to… System 7 October 17, 2009
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Culture, This Weekend I'll Mostly Be Listening to....3 comments
Still talking about prog – sort of – three weeks in. System 7, successor, in a sense, to 1970s progressive band Gong, with both Steve Hillage and Miquette Giraudy of the latter both members. And perhaps one of the very very few examples of a successful crossover from 70s rock to dance and electronica (I guess one could say that Robert Plants Strange.. wasn’t a bad attempt, albeit one which used slightly dated sounds, and er… that’s about it). In part perhaps that is because Hillage did the sensible thing of bringing his guitar with him and using it as a part, albeit highly modified part, of the overall sound.
So what particular stretch of electronica and dance did they occupy? Ambient dance, needless to say. And cleverly they also linked up with a broad range of other artists in System 7 in order to extend the scope of the music. So one will see the likes of Youth and others appear on board System 7.
The album that I most consistently return to is Power of 7 from 1996, in part because the lead off track, Interstate is a fantastic reworking/homage to Neu’s Hallogalloo (and unsurprisingly credited to both Klaus Dinger and Michael Rother on the album). But that’s only part of it, the other tracks are equally strong. Carl Craig is involved in Civilization, Derrick May appears on Big Sky City and Alex Patterson lends a hand on Davy Jones’ Locker.
To be honest one of my favourite series of tracks they did was that for the Lawnmower Man computer game (which was ported to the Mac around ’97 or so), a sort of soundtrack (based loosely on the gruesome movie of the same name) which for some reason isn’t available on disc or download. There’s just something about the glissando guitarwork set against the throbbing beat which I like. Ah, nostalgia. I’m sure it’ll surface in some form some day soon (actually it has, but one has to go looking and to be honest and maybe I’m showing my age, I like the artist to get money for stuff, even if it’s deleted or out of print…).
Interstate
Civilization
Big Sky City (System 7 vs. Derrick May)
Cyberwar trailer feat: Cyberboogie (music by System 7)
The Dockworkers Strike… Labour Court Ruling now available. October 17, 2009
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Campaigns.add a comment
For more details see here.
Irish Election Literature Blog… latest… October 17, 2009
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Irish Politics, The Left.2 comments
Here’s a leaflet that brings back a few memories…
And here’s one from Andre Lyder.
What’s the Point? October 16, 2009
Posted by Garibaldy in Northern Ireland.21 comments
Another blow for Irish freedom from our friends in the dissident nationalist paramilitaries. Thankfully the girlfriend of a policeman escaped serious injury when a bomb exploded under her car as she was reversing out of the driveway. The BBC report states that the bomb was placed on the passenger side of the car, suggesting that they knew it was her car, and that they planned for her to be in it when it exploded. If so, this shows reckless disregard for the possibility of civilian casulties. We’ve already seen dissidents target the family members of serving police officers in Derry. This is just terrorism plain and simple. It can’t and won’t succeed. Seriously, what is the point other than satisfying the ego of those involved, and satisfying their desire to be seen as heroes among their supporters?
A question of history… perhaps you can help. October 16, 2009
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Irish History.6 comments
A guest question, so to speak, from Match Grams at the UCD Hidden History Blog…which you can find here on Dublin Opinion.
The Irish Times editorial… bold Greens. Bold Greens. October 16, 2009
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Economy, Irish Politics, The Left.3 comments
I had to smile a bit reading the Irish Times editorial on the revised programme for government earlier in the week… It wasn’t the fact that it argued that:
The Green Party has agreed a revised programme for government that carries two risks. Time may not allow the party to complete the programme, while there may be insufficient money to pay for its implementation. Last Saturday however, party delegates backed the new agreement by a four-to-one margin and were happy with the outcome. Fianna Fáil and the Greens have bought some more time with more borrowed money.
Well, okay. Although the IT has a point when it says that:
Yesterday, the Green Party leader John Gormley refused to cost the 200 different pledges in the 40-page document. The extra costs, Mr Gormley insisted, would be worked out within unchanged budget parameters, which include a balanced budget by 2013. As things stand, the State borrows €400 million each week to bridge the gap between tax revenue and public spending.
We’ve been down that €400 million road before, in the sense that the actual figure seems a bit vague for such certainty on the IT’s part and the chosen solution of the IT would appear to knock remarkably little off it, so neither is that a huge concern and interesting to see in yesterday’s Irish Times that while they in no way underplayed their concern at the public finances…
Chief economist Dermot O’Leary said high levels of debt in the private sector were of greater concern in the medium term than public sector debt.
“We believe private sector debt levels will increase to 224 per cent of GDP in 2009, and are unlikely to fall below 200 per cent until 2012 (similar to current levels in the UK and US),” he said.
“Given that Ireland is one of the most indebted economies in the developed world, we have benefited most from the collapse in interest rates, which we have quantified at around 5 per cent of GNP. However, this benefit will not be repeated and will instead act as a drag on businesses and consumers going into 2011 in particular as the impact of interest rate rises is felt.”
Indeed notable too was a slight divergence between their analysis:
However, there was some confidence about the economic outlook. “Government bond yields are down, policies have been put in place for resolving the banking issue, a budget consolidation plan has been put in place, funding is complete for this year and has begun for 2010 and recent rhetoric suggest that more focus is going to be placed on spending in the coming Budget rather than further damaging tax increases,” said Mr O’Leary.
And that of the Irish Times editorial yesterday which was much more gloomy:
As more governments sell more bonds this year to finance their soaring budget deficits, international competition for buyers of sovereign debt has greatly intensified. Governments everywhere have been forced to market their debt more intensively. With some four- fifths of Irish government bonds held by foreign lenders, financing Ireland’s borrowing needs on competitive terms remains a challenging task. It is one where Ireland’s international image and financial reputation assumes a critical importance.
Anyhow, that’s another day’s work.
Nor, returning to the GP and the original IT editorial, is it the outline of the details of the PfG, although I’ll bet I’m not the only one to find the following most interesting…
On political donations there are some welcome reforms. In future, corporate donations may only be made to a political fund and parties would benefit in proportion to their voting strength.
Some cynical souls might say lucky then that the GP had a reasonably good election in 2007 and no doubt that’s one element they’ll be keen to see implemented well before 2012. Even more fortunate that FF had an even better one. Still there’s plenty of time for the detail to be hammered out and in fairness who can say exactly what shape it will ultimately take.
No, it was more the lash that the IT gave the GP at the end… for example…
But the Green Party also has some political lessons to learn. It hardly says much for the authority of Green ministers who, having agreed legislation in Cabinet – as on Nama – later allow this to become subject to a veto by delegates at a special conference; or indeed that last Saturday a Government could have been removed by the will of a shade more than one out of three party delegates. Representative democracy should mean that voters elect members to parliament and the Dáil elects a government. That government should stand or fall on the majority it can secure in the Dáil. The Greens, as a party of government, now need to rewrite their rulebook to acknowledge this basic principle of representative democracy.
Let’s take the first issue, NAMA. I’m sure there was anxiety within the GP over whether that would collapse the government, but, if one wants to view this as a process it is hard to fault the management of the issue whereby it was strung out over a period of time and the nature of the vote was such that it made those proposing the anti-NAMA side have a more difficult time than those supporting NAMA. Pretty skillful issue management, whatever one feels about the matter.
As regards the democratic contradiction, as I’ve noted previously, I actually have some sympathy with that principle articulated by the IT, but… there is a problem which is that there is nothing unconstitutional about the arrangement the GP has. If the IT believes that it is incumbent only upon elected representatives, and effectively then only TDs to make such decisions then surely it should be lobbying for some form of ban on such activities.
One might also wonder what the attitude of the Irish Times was to the conference held in 1994 by Democratic Left prior to their entry to the Rainbow Coalition with Labour and Fine Gael. I don’t know whether they believed that was an affront to democracy, but given that they’ve spoken fondly subsequently of that government one presumes it’s not top of their list of complaints.
Thing is that there’s no easy answer to any of this. Clashing levels of democracy generate paradoxical outcomes. No change there. Would any of us on the left feel entirely comfortable with ceding all power away from the membership of our putative mass party of the working class to the parliamentary party of said party were it in government? I doubt it. We might rightly feel that given the not entirely glorious history of the centre left in government over the past century that some sort of input by party memberships is central to our notion of democracy. Of course, one could argue that a key word two sentences back is ‘mass’, but, look at the example of the left and red/green formations in Europe for the sake of argument and one will see that however well they’re not quite at the ‘mass’ level…
Problematic…
October Socialist Voice from the CPI now available. October 16, 2009
Posted by WorldbyStorm in The Left.add a comment
Many thanks to Eugene at the Communist Party of Ireland for notifying us that the October edition of Socialist Voice is now available in PDF format here.
There’s a broad range of pieces from History will deal harshly with the Yes campaign, to Unions approaching the Rubicon! and on the economy, There is an alternative. There’s also an examination of how Harney promotes profiteering from health and What privatisation really means for commuters.
On international issues it takes a look at El Salvador and the mining industry there and consequent massive human rights violations and The untold story of the Cuban Five.
All told, worth a look.
Irish Left History Project: Irish Workers Group, 1966-68 October 15, 2009
Posted by leftopenhistoryteam in Irish Left Open History Project, Irish Workers Group 1966-68.42 comments

Of the other elements involved perhaps it is worth mentioning the Irish Workers Group, which is a revolutionary Socialist group which aims to mobilise the Irish section of the international working class to overthrow the existing Irish bourgeois states, destroy all remaining imperialist organs of political and economic control and establish an all-Ireland Socialist Workers Republic. The leader is Gerard Richard Lawless of 22 Duncan Street, London, a former member of the I.R.A who was interned by the Government of the Irish Republic in 1957. Eamon McCann of 10 Gaston Square, Londonderry, a prominent participant in the unlawful procession, is chairman of the Irish Workers Group in Northern Ireland. The Northern Ireland membership includes Mr. Rory McShane of 14 Upper Crescent, Belfast, who was prominent in the formation of the so-called Queen’s University Republican Club.” (William Craig, 16 October 1968, Stormont Papers, Vol.70 (1968), p.1022)
Copy of Irish Militant, May 1966, here. (5MB)
Copy of Workers’ Republic, May-June 1967, here (note:38MB)
The Irish Workers Group (IWG) was formed in London in 1966, out of the divisions within the Irish Communist Group. It is argued by D.R. O’Connor Lysaght that the IWG was the first active Trotskyist group to establish itself in Ireland since the Revolutionary Socialist Party of the 1940s. This does not mean that the origins of modern Irish Trotskyism lie within the IWG – the SWM/SWP and Militant/Socialist Party, who arrived in the 1970s, are both outside its borders, while the Socialist Labour League had activists in Ireland contemporaneous to the IWP – merely that it is pivotal to any understanding of the Trotskyist movement on the island. Indeed, in terms of personnel, if not quite ideology, it is possible to trace the IWG in 1967 to the present-day Workers Unemployed Action Group in Clonmel, as well as Socialist Democracy.
The IWG may not have been the only Trotskyist group in Ireland, but what made it a step apart from the others was the fact that it had been set up by Irish émigrés in London and brought back to Ireland by Irish people. Almost all other groups I have come across so far were essentially branches of already-established British movements. Whether this lessens or strengthens the authority of the IWG in Irish Trotskyism, I don’t know. However, it is a fact, and needs to be acknowledged.
In 1967 the IWG published its Manifesto, available here.
As regards the story of the IWG, there are two main written accounts. One is by Seán Matgamna, who was a member of the group for a short time, and D.R. O´Connor Lysaght, who wrote an article sometime in the 1980s on the history of Irish Trotskyism.
Matgamna’s account is available on Workers’ Liberty, here. He takes issue with a lot of what O’Connor Lysaght says, particularly with regard to Gery Lawless, for whom Matgamna seems to carry a personal disregard.
Matgamna makes a few claims about Gery Lawless regarding the time Lawless was interned in the Curragh – claims that are unfounded as this article by John McGuire of the University of Limerick makes clear. Matgamna also makes claims about Lawless’ case against Ireland in the European Court of Human Rights. However, a reading of the actual case shows that Matgamna, on this point, is again somewhat less than accurate.
O’Connor Lysaght’s account is not freely available, and so I’ve taken the liberty of reproducing an extract from his article where he deals with the IWG.
Similarly, ‘The Origins of Trotskyism in Ireland’ by Ciaran Crossey and James Monaghan,although available, is hard to find. The last six paragraphs which deal with the re-emergence of Trotskyism in Ireland after 1958 is reproduced after O’Connor’s article below.
I believe, but I am not certain, that membership of the IWG included the following: Gery Lawless, Eamonn McCann, Liam Daltun, Michael Farrell, Joseph McAnna, Bairbre McCluskey, James Lynch, Anne Murphy, and Paddy Healy.
By the way, both extracts claim that Gery Lawless was instrumental in establishing the Irish Workers Union. From conversations with one person who was in the Irish Workers Union at the time, and with another who knew some of the people involved, this does not appear to be the case. However, Lawless was certainly a member of the Irish Workers Union, and an active one at that.
Here’s what O’Connor Lysaght has to say on the IWG. As always with this series, all comments and clarifications gratefully received.
[From 'Early History of Irish Trotskyism' by D.R. O'Connor Lysaght.]
“Although the Republican movement had adopted an economic and social programme [in the 1950s] it was little more political than it had been during the Emergency. Many, particularly in Dublin, chafed at this conservatism. Others, in Co. Tyrone (Saor Uladh) wanted especially to hasten the military struggle. The two dissident groupings broke with mainstream Republicanism and came together around the demand for more action, both political and military. Before the new body could be named, it was destroyed by Government repression. Even then, its members’ search for revolutionary politics had produced a man who has as such claim as anyone to the title of father of modern Irish Trotskyism, embarrassing as it may be to his child.
The man was Gerry [sic] Lawless. He learnt about Trotskyism in the Curragh prison camp where he read the documents of the Fourth International fifth world Congress. On his release, he had to leave Ireland for Britain. There he served a political apprenticeship with the S.L.L. [Socialist Labour League]. In 1963, sections of the International Committee to which the S.L.L. was affiliated, reunited with their opponents, the International Secretariat to form a United Secretariat of the Fourth International (U.S.F.I.). The S.L.L. did not support this move. Lawless did so, partly out of dissatisfaction with the Leagues´greater British chauvinism.
Though he broke with it, he did not join the U.S.F.I. which was probably his single biggest mistake. Instead, he sought to build an Irish Trotskyist group that could not take sides in the International (and even at that time more confusingly the British) Trotskyist controversies. In this course, he made strange bedfellows among London Irish immigrants. First he formed an Irish Workers Union. Then he combined with the Maoists who would constitute the so called Irish Communist Organisation (now the B.I.C.O.) in an Irish Communist Group. When this last split into Trotskyist and Stalinite [sic] parts in late 1965, the former founded the Irish Workers Group (I.W.G.) which brought Trotskyism back to Ireland at last.
The I.W.G.´s Dublin branch was founded in May 1967. A few months later, it initiated a branch in Belfast which included Michael Farrell. Another branch was started in Dundalk. The group oriented towards the Labour parties on both sides of the border. This was justified by a somewhat Stalinophobic attitude to the Stalinites who had taken over the Republican movement after the border campaign collapsed in 1962. However, it was corect for other reasons. The Labour youth movements were wide open. Furthermore the new social hyper-activity of the Republicans was kept within the perimeters of the Stalinite concept of rigorously controlled revolutionary stages, the current one being that of (anti-landlord) bourgeois revolution. Outside Bray, Co. Wicklow, this did not pay dividends. It would be the six county crisis from 1969 that revived Irish Republicanism, even if, in doing so, it split it. On the other hand, the IWG’s contribution reflected also among its members a variation of the traditional theoretical weakness of the Irish left. Ignorant of the 1944 [theses]
[part missing]
… of the Irish international question. In common with nearly everyone, including most Republicans, they expected a peaceful end to partition.
This weakness affected the way the IWG split in 1968. To strengthen the group’s politics, Lawless had brought in Seán Matgamna and his comrades of Workers Fight, a British group with a history of political analysis of a sort. Matgamna showed himself a prolific theoretician but one as weak as anybody on the National Question, in particular on the EEC. He wrote an article for Irish Militant (the IWG’s agitational paper) in which he posed as a fighting slogan “in or out of the Common Market, the struggle goes on.” Anticipating opposition, he made a pre-emptive strike. He proclaimed a faction around the demand for a homogeneous organisation, which meant in his concrete interpretation, expelling Lawless. In the resulting struggle, the three issues were, in order of importance, the national question, party building, and Lawless, but the volume of the debate as in reverse ration.
Matgamna and his allies, including Patrick (Paddy) Healy, were defeated in the group as a whole. They withdrew on St. Patrick’s Day 1968 and Healy formed the League for a Workers’ Republic. The minority had won a majority of the Dublin branch. The IWG was unable to reform before the civil rights agitation in Northern Ireland reached a critical phase. The Belfast members of the group had tended to be alienated from Leninism by Matgamna’s appeal to its tenet to justify anything he wanted to do. On 7th October 1968 they broke with the IWG to form a much more promising but distinctly non-Leninist mass organisation on the lines of the mass centrist bodies that had appeared in contemporary Europe as a result of the uprisings the previous May. The new body was Peoples Democracy. Its birth was, in fact, the end of the IWG, though it was not liquidated officially until May 1969. It seems also to have been the end of Gerry Lawless’ consistent career as an Irish revolutionary as distinct from a British revolutionary supporting the Irish struggle.”
Here’s what Ciaran Crossey and James Monaghan have to say about the re-emergence of Trotskyism in Ireland.
['The Origins of Trotskyism in Ireland' by C.Crossey & J.Monaghan, Revolutionary History, vol.6, No. 2/3, 1996]
“towards the end of the 1950s, the Socialist Labour League from Britain did recruit a few individuals in Ireland, but nothing substantial came of this. This toehold did develop later into an apparently substantial SLL group here which worked in the Northern Ireland Labour Party. They quickly established control of the Young Socialists, which they ran for the next two years. They also had a base in the Draughsman’s Union in the shipyards. A leading recruit from the Communist Party of Great Britain in the late 1950s was Brian Behan, brother of Brendan. Behan was an industrial organiser for the CPGB in the building industry, and continued in this role for the SLL. He developed anarchist ideas, and split during a dispute with the SLL leadership, taking the Dublin branch with him.
Unfortunately, the ultra-left policies of the SLL in general were also applied here, so that in 1964 the SLL and the Young Socialists walked out of the NILP and into the political wilderness. Considering that the 1960s saw the development of civil rights agitation, the Loyalist reaction to it, and the growth of worldwide politicalisation, it is shocking to see the SLL was nowhere to be seen. An organisation which allegedly had widespread support in 1964 had collapsed by 1966, had only a few individuals in 1969, and made no impact on events, although branches of the SLL existed in Derry, Belfast and Dublin, at least in paper.
apart from the SLL, attempts to revive Marxism in Ireland were centered around Gery Lawless. Lawless was a Republican prisoner in the 1950s, and whilst inside read a range of socialist material. Upon his release he ended up in England where he initiated the Irish Workers Union and then the Irish Communist Group. This was a mish-mash of different political strands, including some who later ended up establishing the Irish Communist Organisation, which subsequently developed into the British and Irish Communist Organisation.
The ICG split in late 1965 into its Maoist and Trotskyist wings. The Trotskyist wing, the Irish Workers Group, existed for a period in Britain, but without any support in Ireland. In its early period, the IWG held a number of discussions with the Militant group in Britain. When the debate inside the IWG developed over Maoism, Brendan Clifford wrote documents attacking Trotskyism and the application of the theory of permanent revolution to Ireland. The relpy was written for the Trotskyist faction by Ted Grant, who was at the time the political editor of the Militant newspaper. A slightly abridged version is available in Ted Grant’s The Unbroken Thread.
By May 1967 the IWG had set up a branch in Dublin, to be followed a few months by the Belfast branch, and then one in Dundalk. They set up a paper called the Irish Militant (nothing to do with the later group), and a theoretical journal, Workers Republic. The IWG lasted a short period before it collapsed in late 1968. It suffered two splits that year. After a factional discussion on threetopics – the national question, party building, and Gery Lawless and his role in the organisation, the minority faction withdrew on 17 March 1968 to set up the League for a Workers Republic. This faction was led by Seán Matgamna and Paddy Healy, and took the majority of the Dublin branch of the IWG. Disillusioned by the in-fighting the IWG and attracted by the potential mass student movement in the North, the Belfast branch effectively ceased operating when they joined the newly developing Peoples Democracy in ctober 1968. This was a radical youth group in and around the Civil Rights Association. I think it could best be described as radical, but definitely not a Marxist group, with some of its leadership describing themselves as ‘post-Marxist’.
The League for a Workers Republic built up its base through the growing Young Socialist organisations which seem to have been semi-formal sections of the two Labour parties. In the North the left wing of the NILP and the Young Socialists moved in a number of directions. Eamon McCann is now one of the leaders of the Socialist Workers Movement, whilst some of those active in Derry YS joined the Militant.
By the early 1970s there were a number of groups claiming to be Trotskyist: the League for a Workers Republic, the League for a Workers Vanguard, the Movement for a Socialist Republic, Militant and the Socialist Workers Movement, as well as possibly some other grouplets.”
