The first poll of Autumn… September 24, 2010
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Irish Politics, The Left, Uncategorized.trackback
Forget, if you can, Noel Grealish’s thoughts about how;
…he said he would no longer be supporting the Government and would be writing to the Taoiseach and Minister for Health to inform them of his decision.
“I’ve taken a stance on this. I’ve said it publicly all along that I would find it difficult to support a Government if these cuts are implemented,” he said. “I think I would be wrong of me to walk into Dáil Éireann next Wednesday and sit on the Government benches while this is hanging over us.
“I will not be supporting this Government from next Wednesday onwards until I’m assured that there will be an adequate service and that patient safety will be protected at all costs.”
Well, who knows what assurances the Government might find it’s way to offering him come Budget day? And what precisely does he mean about ‘no longer supporting’? Does this mean that he won’t be voting with the Government on all issues or only some?
But the first poll of Autumn has arrived…
Support among decided voters for Fianna Fáil was at 22 per cent, less than half its 2007 election result and behind Labour on 35 per cent and Fine Gael on 30 per cent, the TV3/Millward Brown Lansdowne poll showed.
First up, this isn’t the same as some of the more – ahem – unusual polls that grace the pages of certain Sunday newspapers. Millward Brown Lansdowne are reputable, and being reputable that’s quite a figure they’re showing.
So, lesson one, Labour’s tactic of ‘say nothing, do nothing’ continues to pay off for them. The wailing and gnashing of teeth, not just from the Government, but from sections of the Opposition, will be audible. 35 per cent is a good solid performance. No, wait, what am I saying, it’s remarkable stuff for a Labour Party used to much lower figures. It also has the virtue of providing a comfortable margin for the vote to slump downward while still allowing for a potentially historic number of LP TDs. Let’s recall that in 1992 at that year’s General Election Labour received 19.5% of the vote and 33 seats. And interestingly Fine Gael received 24.5% and 45 seats. Even more interestingly, in a way, is that at the previous election Fine Gael on 29.3% received 55 seats.
Of course, that’s then, this is now. No-one is arguing that Labour will get 55 seats. As noted by Bartley they simply don’t have the organisation on the ground to compete. But a 35% lead indicates 33 plus. If they manage to retain polling figures in the low 20s they’re looking at matching that 33.
There’s more. If the following is correct it’s bad news for Sinn Féin and even more so for the Green Party:
Fianna Fáil is well beaten in third place, Sinn Féin on 4% and the Green Party at 2% [incorrectly reported on the RTÉ website as 4%]. Independents and others are on 8%.
Millward Brown Lansdowne found the public are evenly divided on the need for an immediate General Election.
49% want to vote now, 47% are opposed and 4% do not know.
It’s difficult to tell whether Labour have cannibalised the SF vote, it’s depressing for the GP (though they might salvage a seat or two on these figures), and telling that Independents retain a fairly strong bloc (though how that would shake out in an election is anyone’s guess, perhaps there’s still a fair bit of FF vote in there).
Worth noting that the Don’t Knows on the unadjusted figures is 17%. That’s a fair figure and one wonders what the impact will be in an actual election.
Also worth noting that for Enda Kenny FG are in the 30s. Just barely, but enough to placate at least some of his antagonists.
You’d wonder too, well I would, how this affects the on again off again Lenihan leadership bid (at least if one is to believe the current issue of the Phoenix, and by the way, hat tip to Irish Election Literature Blog who noted that Mary Hanafin’s stock is rising. The Phoenix posits that she and Micheál Martin have forged an alliance). Who would want to be leader before the inevitable impact with the electorate. And who, genuinely, would want to be leader after it (although, that’s a question that the Milibands may well be asking in a geographically different context – actually, while holding that thought it reminds me of the old Denim song ‘The Osmonds’ which had a chorus that went something along the lines of ‘In the ’70′s there were Osmonds, lots of little Osmonds, there were lots of Osmonds everywhere’. Couldn’t help feeling something a little bit similar when I opened the Guardian this morning in the print edition). Indeed the Millward Brown poll delivers the following in its key findings:
4. Key Findings
A small majority believe that Brian Cowen should not continue as leader of Fianna Fáil, however support for the Taoiseach among Fianna Fáil voters remains robust (73%). Brian Lenihan is the clearly preferred successor amongst those who believe that the Taoiseach should go (46%), compared to just 15% for Micheál Martin.
Of course, we’re not just talking about the small band of FF voters.
As an experiment take 10% or so of the LP vote and hand it back to FF and you’d see them on an anaemic but still stronger than FG 32% and Labour in a creditable third place with 25%. How to interpret that 10% and it’s provenance?
Well, it’s always difficult to tell the voting loyalties of any bloc of the electorate in polls. But I bet FF rue the day they unleashed the attack dogs on the public sector.
By the way, I was amused to read in the IT that:
The survey was carried out on Tuesday and Wednesday, before data showed yesterday an unexpected fall in second quarter GDP.
Somehow, and this is just a wild guess, I think that those figures won’t make the slightest difference to the electorate.
And MillwardBrown back up that proposition…
However a large majority (88%) say the issue has not changed how they will vote –given the poor result for Fianna Fáil it is reasonable to speculate that most voters had already made up their minds.

So either/and/or/all three: FF coup/FG coup/General Election.
Is there another poll this weekend from the SBP, or like the IT, so one supposes, is that a treat for next week?
The IT (you sound very D4 for some reason).
Is that what they call it?
I think it’s laziness on my part to be honest, can’t be pushed to write Irish Times.
Hey, I wasn’t slagging you off. That was fair comment on your part!
Dotski’s spreadsheet says those figures give Labour 67 seats.
Some achievement with 65 candidates!
That’d be Irish democracy for you!
That’d be Irish democracy for you!
Surely some Bertie Socialists in that group…
Seriously, though.
Dotski points out that if Labour wants to increase the number of candidates to benefit from that possibility, it has to do so early in order to maximise transfers:
Sort of counter-intuitive, but what might help in a few constituencies is the fact that the incumbent and long serving TD is retiring – so, in Wicklow, say, if it was Liz McManus +1 (or +2) then Liz would get a quota and a half and +1 would get a few hundred and someone else would slip through. Whereas, if its two new candidates, with an intelligent geographical spread, then they both get nearly a quota and both get elected. Same in Galway with Michael D. and to a lesser extent, in DSC.
Of course, I’m not sure if the vote can be managed in Dublin Central to even get a second seat and a third seat is fantasy, so perhaps I’m just assuming things are better managed elsewhere. There’s a danger Labour could end up with the worst votes to seats ratio ever.
@ Sonofstan
yes, when the simulations are run, there are definitely areas such as DSC where losing a FPV magnet actually splits the vote better and makes an additional seat more likely.
DSC is a particularly extreme version of this, where LP are looking at something in the region of 50% (on the TV3 poll), and a 4-person ticket could see Byrne, Upton, Conaghan and Moynihan all between 9-15%. They’d not get 4 seats, but 3 would appear safe as houses. And Wicklow is another example, although Galway W appears unlikely to pull a LP2 without Michael D’s personal vote (and it’s a long shot anyway even with him)
Dub Central depends on a lot of factors – 3 Lp is possible, but so is one, so I can see why they’d play safe with 2 (although strategically a 3rd may suppress Joe’s surplus to their benefit, releasing those votes when the candidates they could leak to are either elected or eliminated).
The 2 polls deviate a lot, and there’ll be a lot of eyes on the MRBI one that’s upcoming, particularly as it has a new methodology (apparently a result of pressure from FG, from what one of their members implied to me). Lansdowne and Millward/Brown have pretty much as good a record as RedC, as do MRBI, and FG are pinning a lot of hopes on MRBI coming in line with RedC – if they don’t, they’ll look quite isolated, and that’s not to FG’s benefit….
Dublin Central is a weird one. Despite canvassing it from top to bottom numerous times in the past I can’t read it at all. Two seats hmmmm… Can’t quite believe it. Three? The sky is falling.
On the other hand if a media head built up, if the LP looked as if it were doing the business…
Yeah…but probably the reason the two of us find DC so hard to call is because we know it so closely: whereas I can blithely advise Labour what to do in Wickla, knowing only that it’s quite big and…..er, that’s it.
That’s far too close to the truth for comfort.
As an aside it looks as if a lot of people will be voting Labour for the first time. So I suspect alphabetical order will have an influence in some constituencies.
For instance Dublin South if Labour run again with Culhane and White, Culhane will do better from people who are voting for Labour rather than a specific Labour candidate.
Another thing from the poll was that more Fianna Fail voters were dissatisfied than satisfied with the Governments performance. To me this would indicate an opening for FF gene pool Independents. There are voters who are unhappy with the government but couldn’t bring themselves to vote for anyone other than FF. An ex FFer might tempt them.
This I like IELB. Email me and I’ll explain why!
Labour do look like their doing well but honestly I don’t think it will make much of a difference tweedle dum and tweedle dee are being replaced by three blind mice,and thats being nice about it.
While certainly not in Sindo territory, I amn’t sure this is quite as credible as SBP or in particular the Times.
That’s true and the SBP provides a fairly rigorous and continual (or reasonably so) overview.
By the way worth looking at the PDFs provided by Millward Brown, makes for interesting reading. Also judging by the cover of them there were questions so far unpublished (I haven’t checked the TV3 site) on the potential visit of the Queen and issues as regards the Church.
Unofficial leak of the SBP poll has FG 31%, FF 24%, Lab 23% SF 10%
Huge deviation in both Labour and SF votes
If the leak is accurate, that’s quite bizarre – FF, FG, Greens, Ind + Others, all in roughly the same ballpark, but Labour and SF way, way off.
But closer to the last Red C. which suggests the Millward Brown might be the rogue.
I wonder was there a difference in the Dublin / Non-Dublin or urban / rural weighting of the samples?
Really interesting, just home and saw those. It’s got to be Millward Brown as the rogue. The IT poll next week will be interesting.
The only obvious difference is telephone v. face to face. Are people more likely to say they’ll vote Labour over the phone than to a person standing in front of them?
Well I’d certainly be ashamed to tell someone who could see my face that I was considering voting for Labour.
We’ve established by now that you’re not ‘the floating voter’ though….
I’m a sort of floating voter! Or at least I am since I moved house a few years ago.
I only made up my mind who to vote for last time around on the day of the election. And I actually got to about my fifth preference on the ballot before stopping, which is definitely a personal record.
If Maureen O’Sullivan keeps voting with the government, she won’t be where my votes eventually ends up again.
You wouldn’t be the only one from what I’m hearing.
You wouldn’t be the only one from what I’m hearing.
She surely can’t rely on the gimmick of (still) putting in shots of herself and Tony Gregory on her leaflets, and expecting this to get her back in.
I see that Tweedle Dee beat Tweedle Dum in the British Labour leadership election, by the way.
I swear I heard Ed M. use the expression ‘working class’ as a description of the kind of people Labour want to represent. Trying saying that in your head in a Tony Blair voice….
Or in a Joan Burton voice.
I know almost nothing about Ed Miliband. Apparently, Peter Mandelson dislikes him. I like him a bit for this.
Were there any worthwhile candidates in that leadership race? I had figured that everyone would just vote for David Miliband, so I didn’t pay much attention.
Diane Abbott was the only remotely leftish candidate in the race. She finished last with an abysmal 7% of the vote.
Yeah, Joan’s formula is ‘hard-working families’ which, as a quite lazy singleton, make me feel left out…
True enough about Ed Miliband. Fractionally more leftwing than his brother. Who knows?
Seen some interviews with him re climate change and he comes of as almost human whereas the bro. is 100% Blairite clone.
They both had to have strings pulled to get into Oxbridge, for whatever that is worth.
Really? Why so?
Dave-boy:
“Haverstock Comprehensive School in North London, where he obtained a Grade ‘D’ in ‘A’ Level Physics, and, after resitting exams, 3 Grade ‘B’s. Despite the entry requirements normally demanding 3 Grade ‘A’ passes at first sitting, he was admitted to Corpus Christi College, Oxford, where he got a first in Philosophy, Politics and Economics.”
I can’t find the results for Edward.
The father being a (rightly) distinguished LSE academic can’t have been entirely useless. Anyhow, I don’t think it’s important, considering they both did pretty well academically afterwards. But then perhaps the selection procedure was able to spot bright entrants and see beyond the paper results.
@Dotski,
Dub Central depends on a lot of factors – 3 Lp is possible, but so is one, so I can see why they’d play safe with 2 (although strategically a 3rd may suppress Joe’s surplus to their benefit, releasing those votes when the candidates they could leak to are either elected or eliminated).
It’s unguessable, I think, apart from the certainty that Joe Costello will top the poll, and will probably be elected on the first count. After that it’s three seats between LP2, Cyprian Brady, Paschal Donohue, Maureen O’Sullivan, SF (Mary Lou?) FF2, and almost anyone of those combinations could happen – except two FF. Cyprian is not popular though, so he might lose out to his running mate. Labour need a candidate up the P’boro/ Cabra/ Glasnevin end of the constituency. Cieran Perry apart, there is no Left(or ‘left’) candidate up here at all. I can’t see CP taking a seat, though.
I’d not write off Cieran, particularly if Joe M gets involved in his campaign (assuming that he runs) which would presumably pull in votes for him around East Wall. I think LP are talking about Clancy, who would poll reasonably well at that end of the constituency.
On current polling I’d call it 2 LP, 1 from INDs, and 1 from FF/FG. That’s assuming that polling holds of course – if LP slip to 20% (across all polls) and SF to 6% you can take 1 LP off that and make 1 FF/FG certain.
[...] The first poll of Autumn… (cedarlounge.wordpress.com) [...]