jump to navigation

This Week at The Irish Election Literature Blog December 24, 2010

Posted by irishelectionliterature in Irish Election Literature Blog.
1 comment so far

This week a few nice things posted… Bertie and Cyprians card got an airing here already as did the Offaly  “It Happened under Fianna Fails Watch” leaflet. I’ll have a more appealing Christmas Card up to cover the Christmas period.

A wonderful “For What Died the Sons of Roisín?” Poster produced by the Communist Party of Ireland

A recent Green Party Leaflet on Banking Reform.. where the achievements include… “Got Rid of the top banking bosses” and “Ensured that NAMA will give back to the community…”

Another batch of old posters from Militant, The Socialist Party and Young Socialists

A Christmas Message from Joan Burton

A Few from the 2011 General Election campaign……

A Poster for Cian Prendiville of the Socialist Party-part of the United Left Alliance

A Letter from Fine Gael Candidate Alan Farrell introducing himself to the Voters of Dublin North

A slogan they may not be using again…… December 24, 2010

Posted by irishelectionliterature in Irish Election Literature Blog.
Tags: ,
add a comment

There has been some discussion as to possible Fianna Fail slogans for the next Election.

I don’t think they’ll be using the above which was used on a 2009 leaflet for the FF Tullamore team of Taoiseachs Brother Barry Cowen , Taoiseachs personal Assistant Sinead Dooley and Danny Owens.
Full Leaflet HERE

Tommy Sheridan Convicted December 23, 2010

Posted by Garibaldy in British Politics, Scotland.
57 comments

I see from the BBC that Tommy Sheridan has been convicted of perjury in relation to his successful action against the News of the World for libel. I hadn’t been following the trial very closely, but last week came across the Sheridan Trial blog, which provides extensive accounts of the case from people present in the court. I haven’t made it much more than halfway through, but the material is fascinating as well as legnthy. I’ve read all the prosecution case, and a bit of the defence case. Whether you think Sheridan was guilty or innocent, or whether you agree with him or not, it’s a depressing read, revealing a great deal of in-fighting, dishonesty and dishonourable behaviour among people who in many cases had spent their lives working for progressive politics. The accusations of corruption, opportunism, factionalism etc are of course also familiar to leftists across the world. Whatever the rights and wrongs of it, the whole Sheridan affair (if that’s not the wrong choice of words) has undoubtedly done serious damage to left politics in Scotland.

The Scottish Socialist Party is of the opinion that

By his actions over six years, Tommy Sheridan has disgraced himself and negated his political contribution to the socialist cause over 25 years. History will now record that he did more harm to the socialist cause in Scotland than any good he ever did it.

while his former colleague in the Scottish parliament, Carolyne Leckie, stated that

If Tommy had taken our advice six years ago, he wouldn’t be facing a jail sentence and people would have forgotten about it. I think the socialist movement in Scotland has been very seriously damaged and Tommy is the one who’s culpable for doing that. That’s his biggest crime.

I think there’s probably enough blame to go around to land on more than one person’s head, especially in a case where it transpires that people on the left have on several occasions gone running to the press, including the Murdoch press, whether for money or other reasons.

Judging by the transcripts on the trial blog, and by the events of the trial, Sheridan put up a strong defence. 18 allegations of perjury were dropped to six, and Gail Sheridan was acquitted altogether; Sheridan in his closing said that the Crown witnesses were neither credible nor reliable, and that was certainly proven to be so in many cases. What was interesting to see was how in the case of the Scottish editor of the News of the World and one of the paper’s journalists, there had been in the previous trial mistakes made in their testimony (as well as an admission that adding quotes from unnamed sources was standard industry practice), and there were other witnesses who Sheridan was able to show were saying different things to what they had previously, or to discredit. The balance of probabilities was against Sheridan, but in the material I read there seemed to be good grounds for reasonable doubt – as was reflected in the dropping of two-thirds of the charges. I’m not at all surprised that the verdicts were majority decisions and not unanimous. We’ll see if there will be an appeal. One other very unedifying aspect of the trial was that when it came to discussions of sentencing, the prosecutor saw fit to outline Sheridan’s political record, as well as convictions. Hard to see the relevance of his political record to sentencing for a perjury conviction I think.

I haven’t here gone into the rights and wrongs of all this, but there is one thing I think we can agree on. When Andy Coulson, the ex-editor of the News of the World at the time of the phone hacking scandal, is now a senior adviser to David Cameron and where Murdoch can flex his muscles to an unprecedented extent, Tommy Sheridan was certainly speaking the truth when, commenting on the millions of pounds spent on the case, he asked

Is it not time that similar resources were devoted to investigating the activities of the News of the World.

New Political Possibilities in Ireland for all Left-Wing Parties in Partnership with Civil Society – Conference December 23, 2010

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Economy, Irish Politics, The Left.
11 comments

I’ve been asked by Donagh at the ever excellent Irish Left Review to post the details of this conference up. Looks like an interesting idea, and one that

Here are some of the issues to be discussed:

A Conference entitled ‘New Political Possibilities in Ireland for all Left-Wing Parties in Partnership with Civil Society‘ will be held on Monday January 31st in the Davenport Hotel, Dublin. The conference will give TDs and public representatives from Labour, Sinn Fein and the Left Alliance an opportunity to showcase their economic and social policies in advance of the general election. Arguments will also be presented on the possibilities for a grand coalition of the left as a new potential Irish government.

The conference will also explore how real democracy might be put in to place in Ireland through establishing real networks and working arrangements between civil society and these political parties alongside the trade union sector and progressive academics. This will be augmented by an outline of progressive, fairer and more sustainable economic and social policies by representatives from civil society, unions and leading progressive academics.

Policy issues covered: alternative solutions to the banking crisis; new policies to reduce unemployment; a fairer taxation system; a new budgetary framework; negotiating with the EU and IMF; housing waiting lists and mortgage arrears; social welfare cutbacks; re-vitalising communities; public services; political leadership; More efficient and fairer health and social care policies.

Here’s the registration form…

And here’s the draft line up…

The line up is as follows but more may be added later:

Tommy Broughan TD- The Labour Party

Ciaran Lynch TD- The Labour Party

Michael D. Higgins – The Labour Party

Joe Higgins MEP- Left Alliance

Cllr.Richard Boyd-Barrett-Left Alliance

TDs from Sinn Fein (names to be confirmed)

Michael Taft- Unite and TASC Economists’ Network

Anne Costello- Community Platform

Dr.Mary Murphy- NUI Maynooth, academic, activist and former Policy Officer with Vincent de Paul

Prof. Kathleen Lynch- UCD, academic and activist

Tom O’Connor-Economist CIT

Michael Burke- TASC Economists’ Network and formerly senior international economist with Citibank in London

Awaiting confirmation:

Jack O’Connor, President SIPTU

Other speakers to be confirmed.

The Conference will run from 9am to 6pm. Admission is 10 euros. Booking in advance is essential. Booking info: tom.oconnorATcit.ie and deirdreobATeircom.net

They’re still at it… polls show FF losing support, other parties gaining it – but, really really what the electorate wants is a new party! December 23, 2010

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Irish Politics.
33 comments

You’d think that Fianna Fáíl at 17 per cent and Sinn Féin at 15 per cent – or points near enough – would be sufficiently interesting, but no, someone has to gild the lily. IELB/AK has already dealt with last weeks Irish Times poll itself and some implications. I was sort of amused by his parting line about a Taoiseach’s pension until I thought about and I stopped being amused [no fault there, I hasten to add, of IELB/AK]. He’s also referenced the latest poll here.

‘Gilding the lily’ you ask. Yep, Damien Loscher of Ipsos/MRBI wrote the following analysis of the IT poll last week:

But there is a sense from today’s poll that the change has been more fundamental than we realise. We have hit our iceberg and some voters it seems are now less inclined to rearrange the political deckchairs and may be looking instead for a new political ship to board.

Is there? Where in all this is the evidence for such a contention? Elaine Byrne’s piece last week seemed to say much the same thing and yet on examination there was simply nothing to support this contention.

Again, let’s look at the figures, not with preconceptions but with clear eyes. Loscher argues that:

With the general election fast approaching, the spotlight will shine more brightly than usual on party-leader performance. And what we will find, judging from today’s poll at least, is that voters are generally underwhelmed by the political leadership on offer. Party-leader satisfaction ratings, when averaged across all leaders, have never been lower.

But this focus on party leaders is chimerical to some extent. We don’t vote for leaders, or at least not entirely. It’s not an irrelevant factor – but it’s not the only one, as those of us amazed at how loyal some are to FF or FG will attest. And those of us on the left even less so (though having sat through more than one Ard Fhéis speech by one P. de Rossa I saw little enough dissent with his leadership at the time and more than enough adulation from some quarters).

Indeed there’s no small irony in the complaints that now we’ve moved away from ‘tribal’ politics as it was perceived by some, the sort of Haughey era – and with an echo under Ahern, we’re somehow lacking. The Irish Times was rightly antagonistic to leadership focused politics in the past. How telling that it now seems wedded to this in the present. That in some sense this has become the metric for the effectivity of political parties. But even the following statement seems curiously at odds with what is taking place:

Looking back over the past three years of poll data, it is clear that politics in Ireland has changed. Party loyalties have shifted massively and voters have become disillusioned with their political leadership and its ability to manage the country’s affairs.

One could simply argue that the vote has fractured, a process that has long been in train. Certainly it would seem that the traditional 2.5 party system broke apart in the early 1980s. That’s thirty odd years. And from there onwards, or more precisely 1989, it was impossible for Fianna Fáíl to govern as a majority party. The ramifications of that have take time to be seen. But most obviously it has meant that the luster of Fianna Fáil single-party governance has been replaced with other parties moving into more competitive modes.

Sure, Fine Gael is only 3 or so per cent above it’s 2007 election rating (or a bit better according to RedC), but FG is facing an unusually competitive field with a Labour Party that has added 15 per cent – or so – to its tally from 2007 and a Sinn Féin that has near doubled its poll rating.

And what I find so odd about the talk of new parties is that FF voters are going to new homes. I’d argue that in crude terms some of FF’s public sector and middle class vote has fled to Labour. It may be that some of its more Republican support has gone to Sinn Féin, a Sinn Féin that like Labour in recent times, positioned itself over the last year as the natural home for such voters.

And the crucial statistic, as noted in the piece on Elaine Byrne’s article, that demonstrates no clear appetite for a ‘new’ party, is the fact that Independents/Others are not that much above their vote in 2007 at 11 per cent, though we know that if they sustain 11 per cent they’ll return in significantly greater numbers than are currently represented in the Dáil. And this remains true in the RedC poll at the weekend.

Granted if one looks at undecideds they’re at 25 per cent and are up seven points from the last poll (though as AK/IELB noted the the most recent but one Red C poll which delivered not dissimilar results factored in slippage back from that quarter to FF and found it made a minimal enough impact, and one presumes Ipsos MRBI are doing likewise) . But there is no alternative party waiting in the wings, let alone on the ground. And as noted previously there’s no serious way a ‘new’ party could rev up given the contracting timeline ahead.

And even were the McDowell, Ganley, A.N.Other axis to swing into action – presuming such an axis even existed – what do people seriously expect them to achieve? Ten TDs, Twenty, Thirty? Such talk is delusional and more indicative of the times we live in than any serious political analysis.

On a further point one wonders if a sort of PD redux process took place with sitting TDs crossing to a new formation how that would be received by the electorate. If FF TDs one can imagine the cynicism and scepticism at their actions. If FG, well, what’s in it for them given that on these figures they’re about to make some gains? And where else are these TDs to come from? Is it really credible that a new party could be built around – say – the Mattie McGrath’s or Noel Grealish’s of this world? Does that sound like the exciting new break with business as usual that the media and commentariat keep talking about?

By the way, kudos to Fianna Fáil for recognising that it had to retain at least some base.

The good news for Fianna Fáil in today’s poll is probably confined to the party’s near bulletproof performance among the (relatively unscathed in budget terms) over 65s, where support – at 33 per cent – is almost double its national average.

The intrinsic problematics in only having an ageing base are so self-evident I hardly need to spell them out. Whether FF’s calculation is that as each successive demographic cohort shifts into that category they will translate to FF remains to be seen.

But to be honest that’s the least of their problems now.

While we’re speaking about reviews… December 23, 2010

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Culture, Economy, Irish Politics, The Left.
10 comments

…here’s one that mentions Eamonn Sweeney’s ‘Down Down Deeper and Down’ from Alive! newspaper, that now I find is being delivered direct to my door. Let a hundred flowers blossom and a hundred schools of thought contend! Oh yes.

Another review of the Lost Revolution… December 23, 2010

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Culture, Economy, Irish Politics, The Left.
31 comments

Interesting review of the Lost Revolution by Brian Hanley in the Brandsma Review. For those of you unacquainted with that august journal – of which the odd copy used to find its way to my parents house during the 1990s – look here.

It’s a far from bad overview of the book, written by Peadar Laighléis, and it traces the development of Official Republicanism fairly accurately (one presumes that it is a misprint which attributes Larry White Saor Éire membership and seems to do the same to Séamus Costello).

This consideration of the topic from a fairly different angle is actually quite fascinating.

Perhaps unsurprisingly it picks up on Cathal Goulding and Tomás MacGiolla protesting to Archbishop McQuaid when a young Father Michael Cleary maintained on the Late Late Show that ‘PIRA were genuine republicans but the OIRA were communists’, in terms that suggested such a charge ‘offended most OSF members who were practicing Catholics’.

It continues… ‘Later, Joe Sherlock was derided for attending Mass (he wore the pioneer pin throughout his Dáil career’. It also focuses on the fact that ‘the party had no official abortion policy in 1983, but opposed the pro-life referendum and were disappointed by the “Yes” vote in strong WP areas.’.

The review argues that:

Covert action in RTÉ and the media brought them phenomenal influence. One can chart a shift of attitude between 1970 and 1990 among southerners on Northern Ireland, republicanism, church-state controversies, the Catholic Church and American foreign policy, to give an inexhaustive list.

It continues:

This is not soley due to the WP or media fellow travelers, but they had a significant effect. Few journalists quizzed WP representatives about OIRA/Group B or their links with totalitarian regimes. The party co-operated with Catholic clergy and religious on topics of common interest. These religious were remarkably indifferent to what the WP did when not protesting outside the US embassy or organizing inner city social agitation.

Also the following interesting points:

There has been little or no commentary on the movement’s U-turns over 15 years. The party has disappeared [!] but former members are still around… there is some comfort to be drawn from the absence of organized recruitment of young people, and in the divorce between fiery revolutionaries whose dedication won the party success, and the cynical professionals who forged an agenda building on that success. This species requires both wings to fly. That day is over. But the Stickies still haven’t gone away.

Gifts for lefties? December 22, 2010

Posted by WorldbyStorm in The Left.
48 comments

Okay, with now, as the old gag has it – at least it used to be a gag, three shop lifting days to go until Christmas, time is short, many of us are snowed in and we’ve got to get something sorted and fast.

We’ve already in the last few weeks mentioned some books that might be of interest but any other ideas gratefully welcomed…

Any thoughts?

“A bit excessive”… Really, Taoiseach? December 22, 2010

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Economy, Irish Politics.
add a comment

Perhaps the most amusing/irritating news in the past few days was the near plaintive tone in Brian Cowen’s response to the latest downgrading of Ireland’s ratings by the agencies.

The Taoiseach has today described the decision by Moody’s Investors Service to downgrade Ireland’s debt by five notches as “disappointing and a bit excessive”.

Moody’s slashed Ireland’s credit rating by five notches to Baa1 from Aa2 today and warned further downgrades could follow if Ireland was unable to stabilise its debt.

A bit excessive. A near proximate source of much of our woes still isn’t happy and that’s just a bit excessive?

And what was the reason for this downgrade?

“Ireland’s sovereign creditworthiness has suffered from the repeated crystallisation of bank related contingent liabilities on the government’s balance sheet”, Dietmar Hornung, vice president and senior credit officer at Moody’s said.
Mr Hornung said that action, which also put the rating on a negative outlook, was also driven by increased uncertainty over the country’s economic outlook and a decline in the Government’s financial strength.

And also…

Moody’s said Ireland’s uncertain economic prospects were amplified by its required four-year, €15 billion budget-cutting plan, which it said is likely to weigh on domestic demand and further drag on the country’s recovery prospects.
“Should Ireland’s adjustment capacity prove to be insufficient to stabilise debt metrics in the foreseeable future, a further rating downgrade would follow,” Moody’s said.

Those agencies – eh? Never satisfied. The economy has to be sorted out and it’s their way or the highway, but in sorting out the economy their way they still find fault.

And as noted previously by many others, these are precisely the same agencies who gave the all clear throughout the 2000s when the worlds financial system was tottering towards Armageddon (more or less delayed, but who knows?).

David Blanchflower makes a point in the New Statesman last week that is crucial to any serious analysis of these problems:

The lesson I draw from across the Irish Sea is that an austerity programme that stunts growth simply will not work. The speed at which the deficit is paid off is important: too quickly and growth collapses; too slowly and the markets turn on you. The bond vigilantes are at Dublin’s gates once more, demanding increased returns on their investments as growth has turned negative again and unemployment has risen over 14 per cent.

As we’ve seen though the distinction between too quickly and too slowly has been collapsed so it is both too quick and too slow!

And an alternative?

I continue to take the view that, while the deficit must be dealt with, it should not be by a date certain, but based on the growth performance of the economy. That is because econ­omic cycles tend to be longer than political cycles. Don’t believe anyone who says that there is any justification in economics for paying off the deficit during the course of a parliament, or any other random time period. There is a realistic Keynesian alternative to the Osborne/King strategy of slash and burn. Now is not the time to remove the fiscal stimulus, which has helped to drive the recovery.

It has never been more important to encourage growth decoupled from the issue of deficits. Or rather to place the latter in some sort of a context which doesn’t prevent the former from being encouraged and that doesn’t tear into the social fabric.

And that means also that in some way the power of the ratings agencies has to be diminished because in and of themselves they are reducing the potential for growth and rational management of the current problems.

And as evidenced by their latest actions those latter issues concern them not in the slightest.

That Brian Cowen seems surprised about this after the events of the past two years tells one more than might be needed on this particular topic.

BTW, it’s not even as if all that is being done to ‘help’ the financial sector is meeting with Moody’s approval, as noted here.

My quote of the fortnight December 22, 2010

Posted by Tomboktu in Uncategorized.
15 comments

From the Christmas double-issue of the Economist:

Today most people live in a market economy, and central planning is remembered as the greatest economic disaster of the 20th century. Yet most people also spend their working lives in centrally planned bureaucracies called firms.

(Bet John Waters won’t be citing it in a newspaper near you soon.)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 102 other followers