Meanwhile back at the Seanad: The Magnificent Eleven… Part I May 20, 2011
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Irish Politics.22 comments
Just in the Taoiseach’s nominee’s for the Seanad.
Taoiseach Enda Kenny has named his 11 nominees for the Seanad tonight. The list includes Dr Martin McAleese and Fiach MacConghail, director of the Abbey Theatre.
The other nominees include former Olympic athlete Eamon Coghlan, who is a director of the Crumlin Children’s Medical & Research Foundation, Jim Darcy, teacher and member of Louth County Council and Aideen Hayden, solicitor and chairperson of Threshold housing agency.
Also on the list are barrister Lorraine Higgins, teacher Mary Moran, businesswoman and founder of the Jack and Jill Foundation Mary Ann O’Brien, lecturer and broadcaster Marie Louise O’Donnell, Jillian van Turnhout of the Childrens Rights Alliance and Dr Katherine Zappone of the Irish Human Rights Commission.
Interesting. Most eye-catching is the nomination of Martin McAleese, husband of the President. Most interesting though is the political background/inclination of them… anyone know?
Fine Gael:
Jim Darcy, teacher and member of Louth County Council and Aideen Hayden, solicitor and chairperson of Threshold housing agency.
Labour ?
…teacher Mary Moran…
Labour…
Aideen Hayden has served as chairperson of the housing charity Threshold since 1998. She was a Labour party candidate on the Industrial and Commercial panel in the 2011 Seanad elections.
She is a native of Carlow and lives in Dublin with her husband and two teenage daughters.
Lorraine Higgins a barrister and practices on the western circuit. She is also a membership officer with Junior Chamber International Galway.
She received over 3,500 first preference votes in the constituency of Galway East in the 2011 general election. She also stood unsuccessfully as a Labour party candidate on the Industrial and Commercial panel in the subsequent Seanad elections.
More on this when there’s time to digest it properly.
Cork Labour and the Irish Revolution, 1916 – 1922: John Borgonovo lecture in Solidarity Books May 20, 2011
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Irish History.12 comments
Excellent overview by Budapestkick of John Borgonovo’s recent lecture and Q&A in Solidarity Books Cork – who are hosting a series of such events (and all credit to them). This is well worth reading.
This Week At The Irish Election Literature Blog May 20, 2011
Posted by irishelectionliterature in Irish Election Literature Blog.Tags: election ephemera, Irish Politics
add a comment
Starting off this week with someone who was not a fan of the late Garret Fitzgerald. The 1987 Alice Glenn Report “Why Fine Gael Divorced Alice Glenn“
On then to a leaflet from Pat Lawlor of The Socialist Party who was running in the Assembly Elections in West Belfast.
On then to a recent Socialist Workers Party flyer … “Resist IMF EU Attacks“
Back to the 1991 Local Elections and a simple flyer for Eamon Gilmore and Sylvie Batt running for The Workers Party in Ballybrack
From there down to Waterford and the recent General Election with two leaflets…
One from former Workers Party Councillor and now Independent TD , John Halligan
The other is from Ben Nutty of Fís Nua, a party that produced little or no printed material.
and finally also from earlier this year an “Ireland Needs To Get Back To Work” flyer from Labour.
The IRA, 1956-69: Rethinking the Republic – Matt Treacy May 20, 2011
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Irish History, Irish Politics, Northern Ireland, Sinn Féin, The Left.138 comments
Here’s something that should be of interest to many of us, and thanks to Jim Monaghan for directing me to it.
Dr. Matt Treacy has written a book, entitled The IRA, 1956-69, Rethinking the Republic.
I’m hoping to get my hands on a copy over the next day or two and will give an analysis of the book in greater detail soon. It certainly adds to the canon of knowledge regarding the events around the IRA and Sinn Féin during that period.
But Anthony Coughlan has got there before the CLR
You can find his thoughts here on Indymedia.
Garret Fitzgerald … May 19, 2011
Posted by irishelectionliterature in Fine Gael.Tags: fine gael, garret fitzgerald
167 comments
Sad to hear the death of Garret Fitzgerald. The Garret vs Charlie debate was one the the factors that began my interest in politics and as a twelve year old start to collect political ephemera.
His politics may not have been the most popular in these parts but he was very much part of the political scene in those barren years of the 80′s where many of our political opinions were formed.
The RTE obituary
A selection of pieces about Garret Fitzgerald from the Village and Magill archives
Some leaflets from his years leading Fine Gael.
The February 1982 General Election
The November 1982 General Election
And finally a 1992 letter of retirement to constituents
Crosbie and the Queen May 19, 2011
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Economy, Irish Politics.12 comments
I’m sure others have picked up on this long ago, but an interesting snippet nonetheless and an explanation of sorts for this when reads about this…
Itinerary
Convention Centre: the Queen will attend an indoor garden party at the Convention Centre in Dublin’s Docklands, hosted by the British embassy. The event, organised with the assistance of developer Harry Crosbie, will feature acts including Westlife, The Chieftains, the National Symphony Orchestra, X Factor star Mary Byrne and former Eurovision winner Eimear Quinn. A performance by Riverdance, readings from Irish literature and a fashion show with designs by John Rocha, Louise Kennedy and MS will also feature.
New pension levy – redux May 19, 2011
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Economy, Irish Politics, The Left.4 comments
An odd piece by Cliff Taylor in the Board Room column of the Sunday Business Post at the weekend about the levy. Fascinating to see the array of those making noises about the levy, from the Church of Ireland synod through to the pensions industry.
And yet the fact is that pensions provision, as Taylor himself admits, is ‘a mess, riddled by inequity and not structured in a way which encourages people to save for their retirement’.
The problem is that for most workers in the private sector they are simply not paid sufficiently to be able to allow for sufficient funds – if any, and pension provision coverage still remains at or about 50 per cent or less of the private sector – for retirement.
And so for many of us this has all the hallmarks of an entirely academic argument where we’re expected to weep for those who are in either the private or public sector gifted with proper (or even partial) pension provision in excess of the state pension.
This is hard to take when the inequities within companies in the private sector are so stark with often only middle and higher management afforded pensions and the rest left largely to look out for themselves.
And though Taylor tries in his piece to whip up some of the mood music of the last two years as against the public/private sector divide, truth is his heart clearly isn’t in it. So close to the start of the column he writes:
The raid on the pension funds is a bit of a mess, renewing the old ‘public sector versus private sector’ debate and moving government revenue generation into a new arena: grabbing existing assets.
But later he contradicts this view explicitly when he writes:
There is a clear unfairness here. It is not a definite public versus private sector split either. Many public servants, for example, have AVCs that will be hit. Newer public servants are also on much less favourable pension arrangement than their established colleagues.
He might add further that funding for public sector pensions has seen considerable increases directly from PS wages over the past two years. He does at least have the grace to recognise that the current private system is largely a construct enabled by the state:
The industry also charges people highly – and in many cases excessively – for the privilege of minding, and sometimes losing, their money. Tax relief on pensions has been a key factor in keeping the industry alive in recent years – the punters have calculated that once this relief is added in it still represents a good investment even if performance is variable and the charge high.
Got to say, an ‘industry’ that is dependent – by his account – for its survival on state largesse and which covers a relatively well off part of the workforce raises no end of questions. And Taylor further notes problems:
Given the tough time we are having, there is a case for reducing this tax relief, particularly for high earners.
Just a ‘case’?
IBEC’s thoughts on this are interesting in that they can’t even stretch to Cliff Taylor’s acceptance of a case for reductions in relief.
“The Government has failed to acknowledge that the cost of the pensions levy will be primarily borne by employers and employees. It is a tax on those who had the foresight to save for their retirements. Employees now face higher pension contributions, lower retirement income and the potential closure of plans altogether.
“Pensions policy is supposed to encourage people to save for their retirement. The proposed levy coupled with planned changes to tax reliefs and the absence of any coherence between tax and pensions policy removes any incentive for private sector employees to make provision for a pension, leaving the State and future generations facing an even bigger pensions crisis. The government must urgently take steps to remedy the situation.”
What that ignores is who gets pension provision and who pays for tax relief.
What then of Stephen Collins take on this in the Irish Times at the weekend?
While there is clearly inequity involved in imposing a levy on the pension funds of private sector workers, whose entitlements are generally much smaller than those paid out in public service pensions on equivalent salaries, the Government had to find the money somewhere to fund its jobs initiative.
This is a fascinating analysis which completely overlooks the fact that it is the employers of those private sector workers who don’t provide pension entitlements in the main. It may or may not be the case that the public sector pensions are too high (and as regards the differential it would be useful if Collins could provide actual data to prove that point), though that clearly has changed in a downward direction over the past two years, but the public sector at least sees some necessity to provide pensions, whereas, as many of us can attest, the private sector has been more than comfortable to see workers, long term or short term enter retirement with nothing bar – and this quite literally in one case I know of directly, the clock. Lovely symbolism when one thinks of it.
Social solidarity in the face of the crisis is the key to a solution and that means private sector pensioners have to take their share of the pain, even if most of them are by no means in the most privileged sector of society.
They are though de facto almost certainly the most privileged tranche of the private sector if they have anything additional to their wage.
But truth is I don’t really give a toss about the details either public or private when for those of us without pension provision, or any serious level of same, must depend upon the state pension.
Until there’s a serious effort to deal with the inequalities that Taylor admits are extant, and the only clear way that that seems possible is to institute a proper state pension for all citizens – public or private sector, this is a discussion that will remain almost entirely abstract and detached from the concerns of many workers.
Iron by Rona Munro. At the Complex, Smithfield until 28 May May 18, 2011
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Economy, The Left.9 comments
Many thanks to anarchaeologist for the following which, as he says, might distract CLRniks from the main events of the day.:
I’ve taken an interest in the goings-on in Smithfield since the early summer of 1666, when the foundation trenches of the new development were first dug through the burial pits of 27 individuals who died at the gallows at the end of Hammond (Hangman’s) Lane. I’ve been in a position to see Smithfield’s fortunes fall, rise and fall again, recording the material evidence of blow-ins and blow-outs, the rich and the poor. The well scrubbed rubbing shoulders with the great unwashed. Great themes have repeated themselves hereabouts by rote, echoes of the past ringing around my head each time I stumble across what they’re now calling the Plaza.
Another story is there to be shared for the next week or so in the Complex. This is a theatre and gallery with a strong community ethos which occupies the ground floor of one of the new blocks facing the expanse of granite street setts which are currently being relaid. Iron is set in a women’s prison; coincidentally, the old Female Penitentiary stood just across the square, a gaunt Georgian structure which survived until the early ‘70s to be replaced by Corporation housing. A daughter turns up unexpectedly to visit her mother, a lifer inside for the murder of her husband; there has been no contact between them for 16 years and they’ve become strangers. Divergent lives, family bonds broken. The action takes place around the audience, facilitating an equality between the actors and the observers, an equality absent from the interactions of the screws, the prisoner and her ostensibly free daughter, a stranger to her mother as much as to herself. The story is riveting, the acting beyond superb. The proximity of the action is such that you can literally smell the atmosphere; the tension is real and unyielding. You leave questioning your preconceived notions of what it’s like in prison and yet how prison can become a home, despite the obvious restrictions placed on your freedoms and your ability to develop and live as a human being. While it’s obviously trite to talk about freedom in the context of a play set in a prison, the theme expands beyond the obvious, which makes the story as compelling as it is upsetting. The experience itself is something of an endurance test; at three hours (with a 15 minute interval) you’ll have earned your pint afterwards.
Like all good stories though, there’s another one just underneath. The Complex occupies a large space on the square and has functioned so on a relatively nominal rent for the past two years. There’ve been theatre shows, exhibitions, alcohol-free discos and local kids in and about the place making prints and other images depicting their local environment. There’ve been college end of year shows and yes, the odd archaeologist harbouring artistic pretensions hawking photos and drawings of the excavation which facilitated the development in the first place. Funding has been secured for a community youth theatre project, one which will continue director Vanessa Fielding’s commitment to the type of theatre which ‘takes out the fourth wall’. Demystifying the process without diluting the spectacle. Indeed, the place is nothing like a traditional theatre, something which will be immediately obvious as the first words are spoken in Iron.
The former landlord/developer has been happy enough to see the space occupied in the present climate, however prior to handing over the building to NAMA, a new actor walked on stage in the form of Tesco. Tesco wants a foothold to operate an off licence in an area well-known for outdoor recreational drinking and anti-social activities. They’ll pay more rent than the Complex of course and if we’re to believe the bullshit, that’s a result for the tax payer. However, they got into Temple Bar by stealth and they’re now doing the same in Smithfield. Last week they lodged a second planning application for the site, so if you’ve paid your 20 quid to comment on their initial proposal (a Fianna Fáil adjustment of the planning laws which reserves the right to object to such applications for those with the money), you’re going to have to cough up yet again if you believe the space should continue to function.
In the early stages of the development, an area was set aside for cultural use. Initially planned as a Museum of Childhood for the city (or a children’s museum, except the architects couldn’t get the apostrophe quite right), the irony of hosting such an institution opposite the Children’s Court eventually dawned on the developers. What eventually came about was the Lighthouse Cinema which of course is now defunct, faced with a 100% rent increase from an avaricious landlord who just wasn’t making enough money on the property. So, is the Complex going down the same road?
The week before Iron opened, an eviction order was delivered from the solicitors acting for the receiver, giving seven days to vacate the premises. This necessitated a 24-hour presence in the space, with this writer spending a night on the prison bed in the centre of the ‘stage’ which was compensated for somewhat by being able to play the Special AKA at full volume for several hours over the PA. The legal team are not without form themselves; one of them was recently forced to reopen the grounds of Lissadell House after illegally closing off a right of way to the public. These guys charge a lot of money and Tesco’s pockets are deep.
The Complex has been busy garnering support from whatever corner it can and a meeting was held last week with Jimmy Deenihan, Minister of the Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, facilitated by local TD Joe Costello. I’m not sure what this will achieve, as Deenihan says himself, he has no competency when it comes to NAMA and indeed, who does? The planning approach may well be a better way to go as the developers are in technical breach of their planning permission as it stands. A meeting today (Wednesday) with the City Council may resolve matters. The Corpo will doubtless be aware that getting rid of the Complex will certainly remove the last cultural institution in the development and the community will be poorer as a result.
As it stands, the most recent redevelopment of Smithfield is failing, despite the attempts of the City Council to re-landscape the Square and make it more attractive to the hundreds who pass through it daily on the tourist route from the Jameson’s Distillery to the National Museum at Collins Barracks. The monthly horse fair has been taken off the official list of things to do in Dublin, another story altogether with echoes of the ‘scumbag, Celtic-shirt wearing’ trope articulated so forcefully here on another thread, on Joe Duffy and elsewhere. The new apartments seem occupied by young barristers and the cultural phenomena known as Jedward. They pass gingerly by the spliff-sucking teenagers lining up outside the Court every morning awaiting their fate (two country cops overheard yesterday on Arran Quay: ‘did you see them, smoking dope and none of our lads saying a word?’). Yet there’s life to the place and if it didn’t develop as an aristocratic quarter in the late 1600s as originally intended, or indeed reinvent itself for the benefit of the elite over the past 10 years, there remains here a historical trajectory, an urban story which will run and run. The Complex remains central to this.
So, if you’re one of those who laments the passing of the Lighthouse and wishes they’d visited the place more often when it was open, here’s an opportunity to catch something which will seriously challenge your ideas of theatre and, as the cops take down the barriers along the nearby quays, notions of what it really means to be free.
As an added incentive, readers of the CLR will get in at the concessionary price of 12 Euros. Come in a little early and check out the St. Kevin’s College graduate photography show.
Behold! The champions of austerity really know what it’s like to tighten their belts… May 18, 2011
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Economy, Irish Politics, US Politics.11 comments
I’ve been pointing to the dislocation between ruled and rulers in recent posts, but this piece on Slate really brings home just great that gap can be. It asks the very basic question as to what you can get for a $3,000 a night hotel room in NYC where IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn was staying.
$3,000 a night.
If you’re on jobseekers benefit in the RoI the highest rate you can expect to get is €124.80 or $176.7. So, 17 weeks then to hire the room.
The average industrial wage in 2010 was €36000 or $50,968. So you could stay just over two weeks.
Some sort of drink is included in that but it’s less clear whether you’d get food as well.
$3,000 a night.
Just saying.
Socialist Voice – CPOI May 18, 2011
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Culture, Economy, European Politics, Irish Politics, The Left, US Politics.add a comment
To download latest issue please click here: May Published issue
Here’s the latest issue which touches on a range of topics, repudiation of the debt, issues with the trade unions and a scathing critique of the May Day demonstrations. Well worth a read.


