RIA Lunchtime Lecture Series February 12, 2012
Posted by WorldbyStorm in Irish History, Irish Politics.trackback
Thanks also to Séo for drawing my attention to these.
For Lefties too Stubborn to Quit
Thanks also to Séo for drawing my attention to these.
| Jim Monaghan on Republican Party Crazy Stateme… | |
| Jim Monaghan on SF Ard Fheis… the latest… | |
| Tomboktu on No fault dismissal…Yeah, that… | |
| CL on SF Ard Fheis… the latest… | |
| makedoanmend on Sunday Independent Stupid Stat… | |
| ivorthorne on Sunday Independent Stupid Stat… | |
| Alan Rouge on Sunday Independent Stupid Stat… | |
| GM on Sunday Independent Stupid Stat… | |
| As the crisis unfold… on Those Labour Posters … | |
| GM on Sunday Independent Stupid Stat… | |
| EWI on Sunday Independent Stupid Stat… | |
| EWI on Republican Party Crazy Stateme… | |
| EWI on Republican Party Crazy Stateme… | |
| CL on SF Ard Fheis… the latest… | |
| GM on No fault dismissal…Yeah, that… |
Great to hear of RIA lectures. the first of which deals with Daniel O’Connell. Does everyone believe O’Connell was fantastic? After his death in 1847, and while still unburied, Father John Kenyon, Young Irelander, wrote in the Nation that O’Connell had in fact achieved very little for the Irish people. Emancipation, he deemed to be achieved at too high a price, while he failed hopelessly to advance repeal, O’Connell, he implied was not a sinn feiner but a me feiner. I believe that Kenyon, who was born exactly two hundred years ago was correct.
Certainly interesting points Tim. What do others think?
I’ve just finished reading this, by a mate of Adrian Hardiman’s:
King Dan: the Rise of Daniel O'Connell, 1775-1829
and I think I would fall between seeing O’Connell as a Me-Feiner and just a bit confused about tactics: he jumped backwards and forwards at various times in a way that could be opportunistic or a bit desparate, depending on your point of view.
I’m pretty sure everyone doesn’t believe O’Connell was fantastic. But tbh, the talk about his times wouldn’t interest me as much as the ones on Ireland in the 1790s (the United Men and all that); Robert Emmett (the romance of the last futile throw of the dice by the United Men); pamphlets of the 1641 troubles juxtaposed with the talk on pamphlets of our more recent troubles (how the North was different then and is still pretty much different in the same way now!).