jump to navigation

Venezuela Ireland Network: A reply to Irish Times(IT) editorial of 3rd October 2012 October 11, 2012

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Uncategorized.
trackback

Interesting to read this, which was sent late last week and which I didn’t have a chance to post up subsequently, in light of the comprehensive victory of Hugo Chavez – wbs

This IT editorial is just one more in a long series of unbalanced pieces, critical of President Hugo Chavez. Unfortunately, as well being full of unsubstantiated accusations, it is also inaccurate.
In the first paragraph the author describes the economy of Venezuela as “creaking,inefficient nationalised, Soviet-like with corruption and authoritarianism”. With economic growth of 5.6% in the first quarter of 2012 and expected to be at 5% overall for the year, that’s some “creak”. The charge of corruption is not substantiated by any proof or attempt at same. Would the IT use the same standards when reporting on Irish politicians?

So far, the major corruption item in the lead up to the election is a video which has emerged of a top campaign aide of Venezuelan opposition candidate Henrique Capriles Radonski covertly accepting 40,000 bolivars (US $9,300) and offering to set up a meeting between Capriles and an unknown businessman.

In the next paragraph “A frailer Chavez” is contrasted with the “energetic pragmatic young state governor Henrique Capriles”.This is the same man who was part of an attack on the Cuban embassy in Baruta, in which the ambassador was trapped, during the attempted coup in 2002. He was also mayor of Baruta when the police force and coup backers arrested the democratically elected Minister of the Interior.
In the following paragraph it’s stated that Capriles has made the rampant violence in the country with one of the highest murder and kidnapping rates in the world a central issue. Unfortunately the state of which he was governor happened, during his time in office, to be the state with the worst record for these crimes.

Adding to his problems is an internal document leaked to the Venezuelan press revealing Capriles economic policy. The document by the Roundtable of Democratic Unity (MUD), an alliance of opposition parties, states that should it’s candidate (Capriles) win the presidential elections, it plans the deregulation of banks, opening up the economy to private investment and the reduction of state funding for public services and communal council projects. We in Ireland have first hand knowledge of this sort of programme and where it leads.

The article states that “the Barrio Adentro programme that saw the creation of thousands of free public clinics in poor neighbourhoods, is in trouble”, again an unsubstantiated claim.
I searched the IT in vain for any articles on the coup against the democratically elected president of Honduras, Manuel Zelaya in 2009. This country has now joined Colombia at the top of the Latin American league for human rights abuses. My search did, however find a number of articles on the wonderous business advances in Honduras made by Denis O’Brien’s Digicell group.

The editorial ends with the now long disproven lie about Chavez’s association with the Colombian rebels. Then the word “regime” is used in connection with countries such as Iran and Belarus. I’ve never seen this word used in the IT to describe those in charge of the occupation of Palestinian lands. Finally, Brazil’s former president Lula and his economic model is mentioned. Capriles, also tried to enlist Lula’s name in his own campaign. Unfortunately for Capriles, Lula would have nothing to do with him and endorsed Hugo Chavez.

We all know that opinion polls can get things wrong and we don’t know for certain who is going to win this election but I question the source of the IT’s affirmation that this is going to be a close race. The results of 11 polls, all show Chavez having a lead. Some of these are opposition polls and some are showing the lead as high as 10%. Could the IT make public the source of or reasoning for making this statement?

The whole piece seems to rely on hearsay and personal prejudices, which are not the hallmarks of
good journalism. It even seems to be at odds with the IT’s own Latin American correspondent, Tom Hennigan, who in his column on the previous day had been unable to find any trace of food shortages. Maybe the writer should pay more attention to the articles in his own paper.

Link to IT editorial.

Robert Navan,
4th October 2012

About these ads

Comments»

1. EWI - October 11, 2012

Dan O’Brien or the other guy wrote the piece, I’d guess. It certainly seems to be representative of someone who uncritically accepts and repeats tropes of the Anglo right.

2. Feadog - October 12, 2012

The good news is that the anti-Chavez press – from Fox News to the Irish times – got it wrong.

3. Seamus Loughlin - October 12, 2012

Here’s some more information with links to material that was published in El Pais among others. I saw a link to an American Blog that claimed that Chavez must have fiddled the vote. Where’s Jeb Bush when you need him? http://www.ireland.marxist.com/international/latin-america/8561-lies-half-truths-and-bias-the-worlds-media-and-the-venezuelan-election

eamonncork - October 13, 2012

Of course that was the whole point in bigging up Capriles’ chances, so that when Chavez inevitably won the right could suggest something wasn’t quite kosher. Though given the strenuous and widespread attempts by republicans to limit the amount of democratic voters in the US Presidential election, Yanks have a bit of a cheek to give out about the electoral process of any other country.
Romney, by the way, is excellent value in the bookies at 15/8. He’s coming back and will probably win and your winnings will cheer you up in the face of a republican victory.

4. Jack Jameson - October 13, 2012

Conor Murphy MP’s blog from Venezuela: A witness to democracy

http://www.anphoblacht.com/contents/22329

5. Robert Navan - October 19, 2012

An interesting aside on Seamus Loughlin’s comment on Jeb Bush. Some time ago I was in Venezuela as an election observer and one of the places all observers were brought to was the place where the electronic voting machines were being prepared. I asked where the machines had been manufactured. I was told that they were made in Jeb Bush’s parish. Needless to say, this caused great hilarity, given the notorious shards incidents during George’s election. I have never been able to confirm this piece of information but have no reason to believe it to be untrue.
Robert Navan,
Venezuela Ireland Network.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 286 other followers

%d bloggers like this: