jump to navigation

Neutrality or parity? The ‘new’ Northern Ireland. December 12, 2012

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Irish Politics, Northern Ireland, The Left.
trackback

Interesting reflection by Gerry Moriarty in the Irish Times today on the issues raised by the Census figures and touched on here in the earlier post this afternoon. As he notes:

What the census clearly demonstrates is that Northern Ireland is changing and unionists and nationalists would be wise to be mindful of how that change is managed.
Scrutiny of the information might persuade the unionist politicians who are getting so agitated over the British union flag and the loyalists who are threatening and attempting murder and causing havoc around the issue “to wind their necks in”, as they say up here.

And it is hard to disagree with the following either:

Unionist politicians can take some comfort that just 25 per cent of the population consider themselves solely Irish. But unionist politicians can also do the arithmetic. If there are 864,000 people from a Protestant background and 810,000 from a Catholic background, then they should know it’s in their interests to keep on side those Catholics who are happy with the current powersharing that recognises Irish identity.
Ignoring local democracy as was applied, however cack-handedly, at Belfast City Hall over the union flag signals a very self-serving and selective understanding of democracy. If unionism refuses to act smart and with respect, it could rapidly alienate the Catholics First Minister Peter Robinson knows he needs to maintain the union.

This is, as noted earlier, a crucial time for unionism. It has to come to terms with the fact that even if the union, at least in many respects, is secure for the moment there is a contingent aspect that was not there before, or not recognised as such. This requires unionism to accept and acknowledge an Irish identity, and it is also important – I think – to recognise that a Northern Irish identity is not synonymous with a British identity. That is food for thought for Republicans and Nationalists, but also for Unionists. Perhaps much more so for the latter. We’ve seen straws in the wind – ameliorative noises from Robinson, but frankly nothing of any great substance. To make up lost ground – and again, this point was made in the earlier piece today – Unionism is going to have to much further than it has hitherto.
Moriarty also says the following:

A more cautious approach from Sinn Féin and the SDLP at Belfast City Hall might have been helpful. They could have bided their time on the flag, allowing the census figures sink into the unionist consciousness, to demonstrate more vividly that Belfast is no longer a unionist city.

It is interesting how in his view it is SF and the SDLP who have to be more careful. It is worth noting the role of Alliance in this as well, hardly a party to take precipitate risks. And yet in the same piece he notes that the response of unionism in relation to the issue has been very self-serving and selective.

But I think there’s a broader error here, removing one flag – for some of the time – and leaving the space neutral is not the same as removing one flag and replacing it with another. As I noted in comments Mícheál Mac Donncha made a point about a neutral political space that is well worth considering. That in a sense, is the the spirit of the GFA/BA.

But this goes further. Parity of esteem might suggest that both flags would be flown, that shared identifiers would be used, combining both visual identities. But does anyone think that Unionism and Loyalism are anywhere close to that? In the meantime as with the Assembly and the Executive we have neutral depoliticised or non-political imagery which references no community/political ideology.

And that raises a further question or two. Does Unionism want a situation where its identity is projected openly but in a context of allowing for an Irish Republican identity to be projected – because given the figures it must acquiesce to the reality that it too is now a minority within Northern Ireland.

The alternative is that in formal political spaces its identity is shown, as with Belfast City Hall, less and less and is replaced with that neutral identity referenced above.

Which is more palatable – and I don’t mean that in a coat-trailing or glib sense – to Unionism? Neutrality or parity? Because given those census returns the status quo ante ain’t coming back.

About these ads

Comments»

1. Jim Monaghan - December 13, 2012

Northern nationalists as a group are quite pragmatic. And so are some unionists. hence the passport thing. Which is the most useful. Eg getting free university education in Scotland.Going on holiday, which can you get quickest.Funnily I think I qualify for a British passport as I was born in early 1948 to parents born in what was the UK.
I figure the Northern Nationalist identity (Eamonn McCann describes himself thus) is an attempt by ordinary people to make the GFA work.I would guess that this group is mainly nationalist (more probing needed). Note that Paisley said that teh Alliance was a disguised Catholic party or something like that.

2. Red Hand - December 13, 2012

Jim you are correct. A lot of nationalists are fairly snobby about the Free State, think its a kip and corrupt etc. They may hate the Brits (on occasion) but they credit them with being better able to govern than the southerners. Equality and being freely able to celebrate ‘Irishness’ within Northern Ireland would suffice for most nationalists I think. Plus its cheaper and even with Tory cutbacks still functions ok in social services. (When Gerry A needed his eyes fixing he went to the Royal Victoria and not to the local hospital in Dundalk.)
The Loyalists rioting is seen as evidence that the loyalists have lost and while frightening is also evidence of nationalist advancement.
A 32 county Ulster might the long-term solution….

Backhand - December 13, 2012

Some are snobby about the south, and with good reason, but anecdotally, this particular snobby one, and the rest of those he knows from the North, would still prefer a united Ireland. Cultural wif-waff doesn’t mean squat at the end of the day (though an end to open discrimination was nice…). Just because no-one’s kidding themselves that there will be a UI tomorrow, or in 2016, doesn’t mean it’s not wanted, including, I would say, but a large swathe of those calling themselves Northern Irish.

3. irishmarxism - December 16, 2012

Politics determine the census not the other way round.

http://irishmarxism.net/2012/12/16/the-2011-census-results-in-northern-ireland/


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,253 other followers

%d bloggers like this: