jump to navigation

Meanwhile, speaking of class… back in the UK, and no doubt appearing here soon… July 12, 2013

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Culture, Economy, Workers Rights.

A number of deeply thought-provoking pieces by Will Hutton in the Observer these last few weekends. He notes in passing that the current crisis has meant for the UK that…

By 2018, 10 years after the financial crisis began, our GDP will be, cumulatively, 16% lower than it would have been had the crisis not broken. Only war has provoked such a discontinuity in our growth performance in modern times. This is imposing incredible and growing hardship on everybody, except for a few. Average incomes have fallen by 7% from their peak. You can see the effects in any high street. It’s a world where good jobs are scarce, half a million rely on food banks, zero-hour contracts mushroom and the future is dark.

A single sentence, and it covers so much. Food banks. Zero-hour contracts. Unemployment. A close relative of mine is on one in the UK. Listening to the way in which it is used to atomise workers is something else. Understanding the demoralisation and fear of workers in the face of such measures and the very immediate background of large scale unemployment goes more than some way to understand the limited nature of resistance to them.

And as CMK noted on the CLR recently, this is the future, slowly, piecemeal, such measures expand as the crisis continues and as the orthodoxy seeks ever more to consolidate whatever the nature of the outcomes in the broader socio-economic context. This again is why the pleas that ‘austerity’ etcetera is value neutral, from Dan O’Brien and others are so unconvincing. There are political formations structured precisely to ensure the delivery of a more ‘flexible’ work force and environment, for which read a diminution of workers rights and terms and conditions. And as with the recent set back in relation to JLC’s, REA’s et al, this is a process which continues apace.

Still Hutton does a further service in his piece by noting the following the weekend before last. Talking about the latest changes in welfare provision in the UK he notes:

There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance. “Those first few days should be spent looking for work, not looking to sign on,” he intoned. “We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.” Help? Really? On first hearing, this was the socially concerned chancellor, trying to change lives for the better, complete with “reforms” to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work, and subsidises laziness. What motivated him, we were to understand, was his zeal for “fundamental fairness” – protecting the taxpayer, controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.

But as Hutton says:

Osborne has taken the Orwellian misuse of language to new levels. Losing a job is traumatising: you don’t skip down to the jobcentre with a song in your heart, delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the munificent state. It is financially terrifying, psychologically mortifying and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get. You are now not wanted; you are now excluded from the work milieu that offers purpose and structure in your life, along with the company of others. Worse, the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared. Of course you want to find a job as fast as you can. The sooner the whole experience is behind you the better. Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always: a job.

This is something that is under considered to a remarkable degree in the public debates about welfare. Consider our own situation during the 2000s where we had, using the economic definition, close enough to ‘full employment’. And now, of course we have nothing at all like it. In other words the overwhelming majority of those willing to work worked when work was available.

And that’s the key. When work is available. When it isn’t, quite naturally one has unemployment figures, as we do tipping 13 percent. Moreover there is demonstrably a willingness to work.

And the other aspect of this is that unemployment if a dismal place to be. I’ve mentioned before that I was made redundant in 2004 and signed on for a period of time. It wasn’t the first time, but it was in a way psychologically… well yes, as Hutton says, mortifying, particularly because it was in a boom. And his point about networks suddenly being cut away is well made.

Hutton points to a new brutality in British politics but it is of course more widespread. And as he also notes, there’s a remarkable amnesia, particularly in the British context:

But in Osborneland, your first instinct is to flop into dependency – permanent dependency if you can get it – supported by a state only too ready to indulge your mendacity. It is as though 20 years of ever-tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened.

But consider all that in relation to his earlier thoughts about zero-hour contracts, food banks and unemployment, and one can see that this is a broad based, systemic assault on the conditions of those both in and out of work.

And a final thought in this regard. Where are we, in Ireland? Well from his piece two weekends ago Hutton writes:

…on Wednesday, George Osborne will proudly tell Parliament that the government has found the spending cuts to keep the country on course for the biggest shrinkage of the state ever overseen by any large industrialised country over eight years. Indeed, as debate rages worldwide over the rights and wrongs of austerity in the wake of the financial crisis, the IMF’s Fiscal Adjustment in an Uncertain World (April 2013, Methodological Appendix, Table 3) shows that only three other countries – Iceland, Ireland and Greece – are mounting public spending cuts that are proportionately larger over the same period. No large country in the eurozone is being asked to deliver spending austerity on this scale.

Hutton argues:

…on top, inflation of 3% or 4% would not be the end of the world. No sane policy-maker would make deficit reduction the sole aim of economic policy, or indiscriminate spending cuts the chief means of achieving it, whatever the economic conditions – more so given the soundness of the overall fiscal position. This is insanity.

Excise the ‘soundness of overall fiscal position’ (which is a reference to the UK) and the import of that paragraph remains. Yet that is precisely the aim of economic policy in this state. That truly is insanity.


1. Eagle - July 12, 2013

Unfortunately, our fiscal position is so unsound we are not in control of it. Also, unlike the UK, we cannot set interest rates or influence exchange rates in a way that might stimulate the economy. Our situation is not really comparable to the UK’s in any meaningful way. We are more like Wales than a fully sovereign state these days.

Somewhere today I read a column talking about how well UK employment had held up throughout the crisis. I wish I could remember well. i don’t know if that’s true, but does Hutton address unemployment?


WorldbyStorm - July 12, 2013

That’s very true, and it points up the contradictions of a currency union without proper transfer mechanisms.

Re UK unemployment, it hasn’t done as badly as parts of the eurozone, indeed there’s an argument that by the deep cuts in state employment it’s been exacerbated significantly. Still, no picnic there either.


Enya Rand - July 14, 2013

Agree on the comparison with Wales.

But comparing unemployment rates? I’m not so sure.

The reason that the official unemployment figures are better in the UK and the US is:

a) They lie better with statistics. The figures exclude more of the actually unemployed and grossly underemployed than other countries.
b) The jobs that have been created are poorly paid, temporary, and extremely precarious. See Hutton and many others.

I’m coming to the thing that the putative autonomy to revalue gained from an autonomous currency is grossly overestimated in actually existing capitalism. What difference does such autonomy make when exactly the same brutal and destructive debt deflationary policies are pursued? c.f. the UK.


Enya Rand - July 14, 2013



richotto - July 28, 2013

Labour would be dirt cheap and casual in the Uk compared to the likes of France and Germany and the private sector is mopping up for relatively little investment a lot of workers laid off by the state. The conventional wisdom says overall increased employment is an indicator of prosperity but thats not the situation at all in the Uk lately.


revolutionaryprogramme - July 28, 2013

Who is this “we” referred to here?

The idea that working people and the capitalists form a common “we” who share interests in fixing the economy is a one of the great lies by which the ruling class maintain their rule. A simple reference to even the most basic statistics about how these different classes are doing in this period of “austerity” exposes it for the lie that it is.

It is disappointing to see leftists continue to buy into it over and over again.

Until our class starts to fully recognise that we have distinct interests that are directly antagonistic with those of our rulers we will be in no position to free ourselves.


2. Political cowardice stops us from solving our wretched housing crisis | Will Hutton | Comment is free | The Observer « Dr Alf's Blog - July 28, 2013

[…] Meanwhile, speaking of class… back in the UK, and no doubt appearing here soon… (cedarlounge.wordpress.com) […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: