jump to navigation

Changed times… to an extent January 20, 2014

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Irish Politics, Northern Ireland.
trackback

The advance transcripts from the latest programme on BBC which sees Ian Paisley being interviews by Eamonn Mallie are fascinating. There’s something of a looking glass world to quotes such as the following: http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/paisley-heartbroken-over-exit-from-church-1.1661066

In the programme Eamonn Mallie quotes Dr Paisley’s son, the Rev Kyle Paisley, as stating about some of the people who ousted him: “Some of what was said was pure sectarianism and some Protestants only wanted a military defeat of republicans . . .”

Endorsing this account, Dr Paisley said: “There are people and all they wanted was the defeat of the IRA and that was it. And Protestants who were killing and bombing as well and they are forgotten about.”

Sectarianism? Military defeat of the IRA? This language, indeed this very analysis, is a telling indication of how far he some in Unionism have moved from their original comfort zone. Surely, the previous programme indicated that Paisley still held, albeit in softened form, many of the attitudes that were – to put it at its most diplomatic – unhelpful as the years rolled by, but his journey and that of those around him is surely one of significant movement onto difficult, indeed extremely unfamiliar and in a sense hazardous, terrain. So much so that it’s hardly a surprise, although it is a surprise, to read that he is no longer attending the Martyrs Memorial Church because there are those who still oppose his decision to share power with SF.

It also points up how much less far others had to move in Unionism – and further afield – to accommodate the dispensation and power sharing and yet how often they have rhetorically railed against that dispensation.

None of which is to deny agency to Paisley. His personality inflected the conflict, even if it was as much a representation of deeper dynamics as anything else. But while retaining many/most of his beliefs – and there’s a somewhat entertaining anecdote as to how he told Blair in 2007 that he was a ‘fool’ for converting to Catholicism – there is a sense that he was willing to make that accommodation.

Comments»

1. Mick Hall - January 20, 2014

Something strange here perhaps, we are being asked to believe Paisley was told to remove himself from public life in the north, and within the allotted time frame he was gone.

These people were some of his closest long term colleagues; and where was Ian jn when this was going down? It is not as if the man who replaced Ian snr in the DUP has ploughed a different farrow, it has been much the same thing as Paisley minus the chuckle

One might wonder of the horse was spooked

Like

2. Ghandi - January 21, 2014

Having watched the programme and looking at his life, surely he must be seen as the one Politican on this Island who set out his political objective clearly from the beginning and was unwavering on it through the decades and he delivered it. Secure the Union and defeat Republicianism. allow the “Fenians” in and divide power on his terms…all achieved.

Like


Leave a comment