jump to navigation

The London mayoral race May 7, 2016

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Uncategorized.
trackback

Good piece by Owen Jones here. Khan’s victory was well-deserved. As a decent person (let’s take that word back from those who have traduced in the last decade) and a progressive, even if not quite left wing enough for many of us let’s keep in mind he is a progressive, and yes a Muslim he ran a good generous campaign. The Tories should hang their heads in shame – Goldsmith in particular. And Jones makes a further point.

After a decisive electoral victory, there is always the temptation to be gracious to the defeated. The victor shakes the hands of their competitor. All is forgiven: what was said amid the passion of the contest belongs to the past. Hearty applause is offered to the loser.

And:

Not this time. A candidate exploited and incited prejudice and hate. He undermined community cohesion. He indicated to young Muslims that there was no point engaging in the democratic process, because even the most progressive Muslim would be treated as aiding and abetting extremists. And in doing so, Zac Goldsmith became a recruiting sergeant for the very extremists he attempted to smear Khan with.

And I think Jones makes a crucial point here:

No forgiveness, no forgetting. Wherever Goldsmith now goes, he should be met with protests, regarded as persona non grata among an already reviled political elite. When politicians are accused of “doing a Zac”, they may end up complaining on account of the gravity of the slur.

That’s not sadism. If Goldsmith does not suffer these consequences, politicians may wage these campaigns of fear over and over again. They were already emboldened by the tawdry campaign of fear used to stop Scottish independence. “It worked!”, they exclaim, as though there was no lasting consequences on the Scottish political scene.

The ‘dead cat thrown on the table’ approach should not be normalised. Goldsmith is a a seemingly decent person too. But not decent enough not to use loaded terms like ‘radical’ and insinuate risible, but politically damaging, lines about Khan’s acquaintances.

And yet Jones notes that it wasn’t Goldsmith alone:

The decency of Tories like Peter Oborne – who called the campaign “repulsive” – and former Tory candidate Shazia Awan – who called it “racist” – shone through. But they were a small minority. Now senior Tories are condemning the campaign as “poisonous” and as “outrageous”. Too late. The damage is done. And by condemning any alleged antisemitism on the left, and staying silent about anti-Muslim prejudice on the right, they reveal they have no interest in fighting racism. For the Tories, racism is a convenience: a hammer to batter their opponents with, or to exploit for political advantage.

Comments»

1. Michael Carley - May 7, 2016

Edward Heath fired Enoch Powell for less.

Like

WorldbyStorm - May 7, 2016

That is so true. It’s a sign of the times, isn’t it?

Like

2. sonofstan - May 7, 2016

It’ll be interesting to see what he makes of the job. The first mayor that’s not a ‘big personality’. It won’t be all about him as it was for both his predecessors and we might see more of his cabinet.

Like

3. Ed - May 8, 2016

The Tories speaking out once the votes came in were the most contemptible. They are passionately opposed to unsuccessful racism.

Liked by 1 person

sonofstan - May 8, 2016

I’m using that!

Like

4. An Cathaoirleach - May 8, 2016

Andrew Rawnsley’s column in the Observer also provides a good analysis, putting the various GB elections in context.

http://www.theguardian.com/global/commentisfree/2016/may/08/jeremy-corbyn-local-election-results-labour-leadership

The BLP position well summed up,

“While there is plenty of variation in the outcomes of the different elections, there is a big picture and it has one clear theme. Labour lost seats in Scotland, lost seats in Wales and lost seats in England. The very special case of London aside, these elections were awful for Labour.”

In talking about Wales, he comments,

“But Ukip eating some of Labour’s lunch in Wales? One of those doing the munching being Neil “cash in brown envelopes” Hamilton? That really shouldn’t be happening if the Corbyn thesis is correct. If the magic potion was working as promised, Labour should not be also leeching support to Nigel Farage’s gang in northern England.”

Like

Ed - May 8, 2016

Rawnsley desperately trying to compensate for his bitterness that the disaster he’s been predicting since last September didn’t materialise, despite his own best efforts and those of his allies in the Labour Party. This is the guy who presented the Iraq war as Tony Blair’s great triumph back in 2003. His virulent hatred of Corbyn has nothing to do with psephology. He’d still be presenting the elections as a disaster if Labour had gained a thousand seats. Scottish Labour has been paying the bill for what his hero Blair did in office, and may never recover. Going by the metrics supplied by the Guardian before the vote, Labour had a good election in London and England, an okay election in Wales and a bad election in Scotland. Entirely characteristic of Rawnsley to try moving the goalposts when he doesn’t get what he wants.

Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: