jump to navigation

Surveillance society June 22, 2016

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Uncategorized.
trackback

Sometimes – for all the talk about surveillance, one reads something that is simply astounding. Take for example this – in the course of a Fred Kaplan piece on what sort of a President Clinton might be in relation to foreign policy (précis: anxiety inducing more than likely). He writes about her proposals for an ‘intelligence surge’ in response to the Orlando shootings…

…upping the budgets of intelligence and law enforcement agencies, improving their coordination on a local and federal level, working with Silicon Valley to track and analyze jihadist recruiters on social media networks, and working with responsible leaders in Muslim neighborhoods (rather than alienating them by suggesting—as Trump did, in his speech on the same day—that all American Muslims are somehow complicit in the actions of extremists).

But, check this out:

Some of these proposals are new, especially the “intelligence surge,” and seem tailored to the evolving domestic threats. It’s true, as Politico recently reported, that the FBI has enough agents to track just 48 suspected terrorists in the U.S., 24/7, at any one time. But it may also be true that, in order to find and relentlessly pursue possible “lone-wolf” terrorists (those with no direct connections to jihadist organizations), the FBI would have to change its nature from a law enforcement bureau to a domestic intelligence agency, with broad powers going beyond the restrictions of prosecutorial probes. Is that a path we want to go down? Does Clinton want to pave that path? It’s unclear.

Just 48 suspects at any one time? And yet it makes sense when one thinks about it. One needs to have massive resources of people and materials in order to mount a blanket surveillance operation.

Comments»

1. Dermot O Connor - June 22, 2016

The US security state has been waiting in the wings well before 911. Every terrorist, nutjob and/or false flag attack has allowed them to take one step closer. The 1993 clipper chip (attempted roll out under Bill Clinton), for example (apparently never implemented, but they’re pretty much doing this now with superior modern tech anyway). Problem for them now is that they’re drowning under the data, signal to noise.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip

Like

WorldbyStorm - June 22, 2016

God, I’d forgotten about that DOC. Wow.

Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: