jump to navigation

A universe made for life? Perhaps not… September 10, 2016

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Uncategorized.


The universe may be a lonelier place than previously thought. Of the estimated 100 billion galaxies in the observable universe, only one in 10 can support complex life like that on Earth, a pair of astrophysicists argues. Everywhere else, stellar explosions known as gamma ray bursts would regularly wipe out any life forms more elaborate than microbes. The detonations also kept the universe lifeless for billions of years after the big bang, the researchers say.

“It’s kind of surprising that we can have life only in 10% of galaxies and only after 5 billion years,” says Brian Thomas, a physicist at Washburn University in Topeka who was not involved in the work. But “my overall impression is that they are probably right” within the uncertainties in a key parameter in the analysis.


Scientists have long mused over whether a gamma ray burst could harm Earth. The bursts were discovered in 1967 by satellites designed to spot nuclear weapons tests and now turn up at a rate of about one a day. They come in two types. Short gamma ray bursts last less than a second or two; they most likely occur when two neutron stars or black holes spiral into each other. Long gamma ray bursts last for tens of seconds and occur when massive stars burn out, collapse, and explode. They are rarer than the short ones but release roughly 100 times as much energy. A long burst can outshine the rest of the universe in gamma rays, which are highly energetic photons.

That seconds-long flash of radiation itself wouldn’t blast away life on a nearby planet. Rather, if the explosion were close enough, the gamma rays would set off a chain of chemical reactions that would destroy the ozone layer in a planet’s atmosphere. With that protective gas gone, deadly ultraviolet radiation from a planet’s sun would rain down for months or years—long enough to cause a mass die-off.

What’s interesting is that researchers figure that life is now only feasible the further out from the centre of a galaxy. Which cuts down significantly on the number of star systems where life may take hold. And the implications? That the search for life should be directed outwards towards the edge of the galaxy rather than inward.


1. EWI - September 10, 2016

My impression now is that unless enormous investment is made in the facilities to ‘engineer’ the atmosphere, we’re screwed. Thanks to the Bushes, Harpers and such of the world it’s now too late to avoid massive environmental collapse due to climate change. Maybe this (or nuclear self-immolation) is the fate of even those civilisations which do avoid the gamma-ray danger.


2. gendjinn - September 12, 2016

Manifold Time by Stephen Baxter – his only good one as far as I can tell.


gendjinn - September 12, 2016

Manifold Space not Time.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: