jump to navigation

A champion for the forgotten millions? Er. No. February 8, 2017

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Uncategorized.
trackback

Interesting insight into just how self-serving some on the US right are in relation to Trump in a piece in the Observer on Sunday. John Daniel Davidson writes that:

America is deeply divided, but it’s not divided between fascists and Democrats. It’s more accurate to say that America is divided between the elites and everybody else, and Trump’s election was a rejection of the elites.

And:

That’s not to say plenty of Democrats and progressives don’t vehemently oppose Trump. But the crowds of demonstrators share something in common with our political and media elites: they still don’t understand how Trump got elected, or why millions of Americans continue to support him. Even now, recent polls show that more Americans support Trump’s executive order on immigration than oppose it, but you wouldn’t know it based on the media coverage.

While:

The fact is, many Americans who voted for Trump, especially those in suburban and rural areas across the heartland and the south, have long felt disconnected from the institutions that govern them. On immigration and trade, the issues that propelled Trump to the White House, they want the status quo to change.

There’s something blackly humorous about a situation where the winning candidate actually won less of the vote than the losing candidates and by some millions, but I guess pitching this as the elites vs the rest would somehow be muddied by that inconvenient fact.

Or what about this?

…the Tea Party didn’t begin as a reaction against Obama’s presidency but that of George W Bush. As far as most Americans were concerned, the financial crisis was brought on by the excesses of Wall Street bankers and the incompetency of our political leaders. Before the Tea Party coalesced into a political movement, the protesters weren’t just traditional conservatives who cared about limited government and the constitution. They were, for the most part, ordinary Americans who felt the system was rigged against them and they wanted change.

Uh-huh?

But change didn’t come. What they got was more of the same. Obama offered a series of massive government programmes, from an $830bn financial stimulus, to the Affordable Care Act, to Dodd-Frank, none of which did much to assuage the economic anxieties of the middle class. Americans watched as the federal government bailed out the banks, then the auto industry and then passed healthcare reform that transferred billions of taxpayer dollars to major health insurance companies. Meanwhile, premiums went up, economic recovery remained sluggish and millions dropped out of the workforce and turned to food stamps and welfare programmes just to get by. Americans asked themselves: “Where’s my bailout?”

But hang on. That’s another expedient analysis. What of a Congress that was so utterly hostile to Obama and his programmes that it stymied so much of same? Again, this is all very convenient ut it’s not terribly convincing.

And this exemplifies this:

In many ways, the 2016 election wasn’t just a referendum on Obama’s eight years in the White House, it was a rejection of the entire political system that gave us Iraq, the financial crisis, a botched healthcare law and shocking income inequality during a slow economic recovery. From Akron to Alaska, millions of Americans had simply lost confidence in their leaders and the institutions that were supposed to serve them. In their desperation, they turned to a man who had no regard for the elites – and no use for them.

Remind us again how Trump’s policy (lack of same actually) on healthcare will impact on those millions? Or what of the figures in the White House today who have precisely the same financial sector pedigree that brought us that crisis. Or income inequality from a candidate whose actual stated tax policies will exacerbate it?

Tiresome stuff.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. CL - February 8, 2017

The Great Reaction is well underway:

“Surveying the entire spectrum of Trump’s executive orders, his federal agency appointees, the flurry of congressional pro-privatization legislation, and state-side attacks on Democrat-run cities, reveals the true extent of the coming assault on basic government and progressive values that puts people before profits. With Congress and federal agencies swiftly being occupied by corporate privateers, progressives are going to be looking to local lines of defense for the kinds of public services and safety nets they want. But those too are under attack.”
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/08/trumps-tweets-are-a-sideshow-his-executive-orders-are-building-a-corporate-state_partner/

The Romans had the circus to distract the masses. The tweeter-in-chief is his own circus. But the bizarre reality show dominating the MSM should not be allowed deflect attention from the very real regressive attack on all progressive programs.

Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: