Spying and surveillance claims rock the BNP… er, isn’t that (allegedly) what the far right does? December 19, 2007
Posted by WorldbyStorm in The Far Right.trackback
According to the Guardian:
The British National Party has been engulfed by a bitter internal row with around 50 senior figures resigning the party whip amid claims the leadership has been spying on private emails and telephone calls.
Good Lord, fancy that. Sort of like a … a police state!
Nick Griffin, the leader of the far-right group, is facing widespread criticism over his handling of the situation, while police confirmed yesterday they were investigating claims that a BNP security team stole files and computer equipment from the home of a regional official.
Dear oh, dear, ‘security teams’? Allegations of theft?
The Labour MP Jon Cruddas has written to the head of the Metropolitan police, Sir Ian Blair, calling for an inquiry into what he claims are “criminal activities involving senior members” of the party.
“The BNP leadership is showing us its true colours,” said Cruddas, who is expected to raise the matter in the House of Commons today.
A party founded by John Tyndall – ‘showing its true colours’? Who would have thought it?
Simon Derby, the BNP’s national spokesman, denied the party had done anything illegal and said the equipment that was taken belonged to the party.
He said the situation had been “a bit messy” but the people involved had been plotting a coup against Griffin and needed to be challenged. A line would be drawn under the issue over the coming weeks, he said.
A coup attempt? In a party of the far-right? Who knew?
“They appear to be monitoring phone calls and emails of their members and removing computers from private households. This is not the behaviour of a normal political party and I would like to see the police investigate this.”
The B.N.P? A normal party? (allegedly) engaged in this sort of activity? With their reputation?
What were they (allegedly) thinking of?
Ah, but were they following members of other parties to the bookies etc?
LikeLike
Only when necessary…
LikeLike
Didn’t something very similar happen in the French National Front a few years back, in the feud between the Le Pen and Megret wings, when Megret was trying to take over? One side broke into the central party offices and took all the computers, left the other side high and dry. Can’t remember which side though.
LikeLike
In this sort of instance you’d suppose – if they were being true to their belief system – it would probably be both sides!
LikeLike
What a larf. I have been enjoying the ructions in the BNP, much more fun than the depressing factional battle between RR and Reespect. But as I’ve said elsewhere, this split has come about owing to the contradictions piling up within the BNP. The left has had nothing to do with it. The split has given us a breather to get our act together, that’s all. The material the fascists leech off is still very much out there.
LikeLike
If you want a BNP-related laugh:
http://www.bnptv.org.uk/
LikeLike
The second video – about how Christmas is “British through and through” is amazing. I’ve been laughing for about 10 minutes now…
LikeLike
Thanks for that Pidge. Real Christmas spirit – eh?
AVPS, very much agree. In a way it’s a sort of unpleasant echo of ‘revolutionary’ or ‘reformist’, but it’s closer to ‘power’ and ‘more power’.
LikeLike
That fella has different coloured eyes. A quare Aryan if ever there was one.
LikeLike
The Soviets used to make a very similar point about Goebbels back in the day…
LikeLike
I was reading Alexei Tolstoys ‘The Making of Russia’ (1944) the other day and he has some very amusing information on the Goths and their habit of bandaging the heads of infants to give their heads a “noble shape”. Tolstoy remarks “naturally to the detriment of their mental capacity”
LikeLike
Hmmm…
LikeLike
Sorry for dragging up an old thread but…
That recently leaked BNP membership list reveals an interesting situation.
There’s two members listed in the republic, and one of them shows up as being an active member of the Community Workers Co-Operative. Now maybe they’re just a genuine community activist who doesn’t mind the company of lefties, but the CWC’s objective is to promote – ‘anti-oppressive, anti-sexist and anti-racist community work’. Wonder what’s going on there.
LikeLike
It is an oddity, isn’t it? Although some community activists can tilt pretty far rightwards…
LikeLike
There’s two members listed in the republic, and one of them shows up as being an active member of the Community Workers Co-Operative. Now maybe they’re just a genuine community activist who doesn’t mind the company of lefties, but the CWC’s objective is to promote – ‘anti-oppressive, anti-sexist and anti-racist community work’. Wonder what’s going on there.
A different **** *****, I imagine. The one who you seem to be referring to seems to be from Waterford according to the links, whereas the one whose name is on the list has a Dublin address.
LikeLike
The IRSP have the whole story here –
http://rsmforum.proboards107.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=2016
LikeLike
Same guy for sure – same name, same email address.
LikeLike
Hmmm… I’d say there’s an interesting story there…
LikeLike