jump to navigation

Mortgage arrears… August 29, 2012

Posted by WorldbyStorm in Economy, Irish Politics.
trackback

Richard Curran tells it like it is in the SBP as regards mortgage arrears.

The latest mortgage arrears figures from the Central Bank represent a truly appalling vista for a society trying to cope with one of the biggest property boom/bust scenarios in recent decades.

And he continues that although…:

The headline figures are quite depressing…the cold statistic that 10.9 per cent of private residential mortgage accounts, or 83,251, are in arrears by over 90 days, doesn’t fully capture the stress and pain that thousands of families are going through.

Because:

…add on to that the 45,165 mortgages in arrears by less than 90 days, and the 84,941 that have already been restructured in some way, and it really begins to mount up.
The net result is that 22 per cent of home loans in the state are in trouble in some form or have got some kind of restructuring deal.

This is an astounding figure on the face of it. Just over 1 in 5 mortgages and creeping up to 1 in 4 are now in trouble. Remember, this is a figure that has increased rapidly in the past three or four years.
And for all the nebulous but positive spin put on it by various parties Curran doesn’t believe it is likely to improve any time soon.

The small chink of light at the end of the tunnel is the fact that the numbers in arrears by less than 90 days has dipped slightly from 46,284 to the 45,165 figure. This is being welcomed as a sign that perhaps levels are beginning to bottom out and while the problem is very significant, it may not be about to get worse.
Not so. The big problem on the horizon is the budget – and then possibly the budget after that. If within the last eight months, some categories of figures had stabilised, it doesn’t take into account the savage cuts/tax hikes likely to come in the next two budgets.

Alan McQuaid formerly of Bloxham in his single transferable – but gloomily accurate – statement that was issued with each new round of house price figures, used to emphasise that until there was employment stability there would be no stabilisation in house prices. And that, in a sense, is the other side of this equation. Because the two issues – that of rapidly falling house prices and rapidly increasing mortgage arrears are directly linked to the broader health of the economy. As Curran notes taxation and cuts (and interesting that he recognises that the latter impact directly upon this as well) will make mortgage repayment starkly more difficult for many, and for a number essentially impossible. Indeed Curran makes a very very important point that is often ignored in the discussion on tax increases/expenditure cuts.

Spending cuts reduce the amount of money going into the economy which has a knock on effect on companies that would otherwise benefit from that spending. This will put pressure on jobs.

Little wonder that in the face of sustained pressure from various media commentators the Government is unwilling to do too much as regards Croke Park. Substantial cuts in that area and the knock on effect on local economies will be significant. And Curran, unusually – though not for him, he’s made the point before – tackles that explicitly.

There is a strong body of opinion, and it may well be shared by the Troika itself, that we cannot get through this crisis while keeping the Croke Park deal intact. Any further pay or job cuts in the public sector would also affect people’s ability to repay mortgages.

But this is true more broadly.
And Curran number crunches the figures to suggest that ‘in theory [mortgage losses] present a loss to the banks of up to… €13.7bn’, but that the various re-capitalisation programmes have ‘in theory … [brought] the total sum available to cover mortgage losses to €14bn’. As he says, that’s tight, and if there are requirements to use part of that €14bn on other areas of loss – he mentions business loans – then there’s deep problems ahead for the banks. And as he notes, that’s putting aside the sheer misery that this represents for those caught in this situation.

The problem is though that it’s not just the next Budget. Consider his words above ‘and then possibly the budget after that’. That too is going to be another deflationary Budget. And Michael Taft and others have pointed to the reality that subsequent budgets will also be deflationary. Moving towards 1 in 4. And we’re a long way from the end of this process. Oh yes, and one last figure from Curran. Relative to GDP, at €62bn we have the unlovely record of the most expensive bank bailout in a developed state in history.

Comments»

1. Nessa Childers - August 29, 2012

Of course it’s impossible to keep on having these kinds of budgets on a multiannual basis. Presumably there is a plan b.

Like

CMK - August 29, 2012

Eh, that’s news to me, Nessa. Do you have any details on Plan B? It might be impossible but it sure looks like Labour and Fine Gael are going to give it a try! My understanding is that the government will keep cutting/increasing taxes & charges until they reach the deficit target of 3% of GDP agreed with the Troika under the bailout. And, when they get there, they’ll then have to implement the Austerity Treaty (thanks, Labour) and keep cutting/taxing until we get to the .5% target under THAT treaty. Oh, and while we’re trying to get there we’ll have to start paying down the colossal national debt at a rate of 5% per year in a context where our GDP and GNP gap is about 23% and we have to use the resources of the smaller measure (GNP) to meet targets denominated against the much larger measure (GNP). It’s a case of the application of the old maxim, on an entire advanced society, of “the beatings will increase until morale improves”. The arrears figure in 2015 will be a sight to behold but at least Pat, Eamo, Ruairi and Joan’s pensions will be in the bag by then so that should serve as some consolation. Sorry to be snarky Nessa and fair play to you for commenting but the Labour are implementing a disaster on this society and, aside from odd dissensions here and there, they seem quite happy to do so.

Like

2. shea - August 29, 2012

how do they tell the difference between private mortgage’s and mortgages land lords took out on buy to let properties. if another vestige interest gets a prop up that would be ‘fuckin deadly’

Like

RosencrantzisDead - August 29, 2012

The Central bank stipulates that the figures are for principal dwellings. The banks themselves would have this information – Buy-to-Lets are easier to repossess because the bank can simply appoint a receiver to manage the property or arrange sale of it.

Like

3. Nessa Childers - August 29, 2012

remember that I am not a member of the government or the oireachtas so I don’t get told of such plans. I represent mostly the ethos of the Labour Party as an MEP in the Socialist Group. The plan b IMOP is enunciated by Colm McCarthy, who speaks a kind of terrifying truth. Form last Sunday: ” There will be debt relief anyway in whatever eurozone countries are unable to regain market access at affordable interest rates. They will default. In addition to a second default for Greece, market bond prices reflect high risks for Portugal, Spain and Italy, as well as Ireland. ” My worry is that governments think they CAN implement these programmes. To do so is not only immoral beyond a certain point but also economically absurd. It is especially so for social democrats.

Like

ejh - August 29, 2012

And yet in country after country social democrats in parliament have gone along with it and the exceptions have been desperately small in number.

Like

Jim Monaghan - August 31, 2012

Sorry Nessa. Membership of the Labour Party implies support for its work in government. Time for people like yourself to think of jumping ship. Only when they see a serious revolt will the careerists think again. Mind you a cynic like Rabbitte would be happy in FG. Michael O’Leary ended up there.

Like

4. Economic crisis: Sobering thought of the day… « The Cedar Lounge Revolution - August 29, 2012

[…] just post this up as a sobering thought of the day from CMK who wrote the following comment here (I’ve edited it down just a little). My understanding is that the government will keep […]

Like

5. As to the Coalition… « The Cedar Lounge Revolution - August 30, 2012

[…] a growing economy’. Well, perhaps, but if you read Richard Curran in the same edition – referenced here – talking about mortgage arrears figures (now creeping up to 1 in 4 mortgages – and more on […]

Like

6. CMK - August 31, 2012

Another element of the mortgage arrears crisis is that everyone who goes into arrears, is restructured etc, etc, will have their credit rating written down. This will affect future eligibility for loans etc. One impact of this will be in third level access. Some will have seen over the summer the rash of universities announcing link ups with the banks to loan students, and their parents, the amount required for three/four year registration fees with this clearly blending effortlessly into loans for full fees when the latter are re-introduced. Indeed, the ‘loans for registration fees’ move is clearly a ruse to get in place the infrastructure for ‘loans for full fees’. Anyway, should a parent’s credit rating be downgraded due to mortgage arrears or should the parent be regarded as a credit risk because of a mortgage default then loans will not be forthcoming for third level fees. A household in 90 days or more arrears with one, two, three or more college age kids will be in trouble. And it is itself troubling that academia, as a whole, seem happy to allow such grossly inequitable tie ups between universities and banks. Banks, we should recall, that we’re also paying to keep afloat in the first instance.

Like

7. William - September 2, 2012

While the thrust of this article is correct, it is important to get the facts right.

“83,251, are in arrears by over 90 days … add on to that the 45,165 mortgages in arrears by less than 90 days, and the 84,941 that have already been restructured in some way, and it really begins to mount up…”

Is it clear that the 84,941 who restructured their mortgages do not overlap with the c130k who are in arrears? Particularly amongst those with arrears stemming from difficulty in paying, I would think that those two sets would overlap significantly, meaning there is a lot of double-counting, and the true proportion is well less than 22 per cent; Nevertheless, this is a terrifying prospect.

Like

WorldbyStorm - September 2, 2012

Fair point. I think it well worth checking that out just for accuracy.

Like


Leave a comment